Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40760086›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2025

Reliability of a German version of the Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire (KCCQ) administered via telephone.

Martha Schutzmeier, Viktoria Rücker, Jonas Widmann, Anna Grau, Caroline Morbach, John A Spertus, Jürgen Deckert, Stefan Störk, Peter U Heuschmann

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Trial
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Martha SchutzmeierInstitute for Clinical Epidemiology and Biometry, Julius-Maximilian University Würzburg, Würzburg, Germany. martha.nast@uni-wuerzburg.de.
Viktoria RückerInstitute for Clinical Epidemiology and Biometry, Julius-Maximilian University Würzburg, Würzburg, Germany.
Jonas WidmannInstitute for Clinical Epidemiology and Biometry, Julius-Maximilian University Würzburg, Würzburg, Germany.
Anna GrauInstitute for Clinical Epidemiology and Biometry, Julius-Maximilian University Würzburg, Würzburg, Germany.
Caroline MorbachDepartment Clinical Research and Epidemiology, Comprehensive Heart Failure Center Würzburg, University Hospital Würzburg, Würzburg, Germany.
John A SpertusKansas City's Healthcare Institute for Innovations in Quality and Saint Luke's Mid America Heart Institute, University of Missouri, Kansas City, MO, USA.
Jürgen DeckertInstitute for Clinical Epidemiology and Biometry, Julius-Maximilian University Würzburg, Würzburg, Germany.
Stefan StörkDepartment Clinical Research and Epidemiology, Comprehensive Heart Failure Center Würzburg, University Hospital Würzburg, Würzburg, Germany.
Peter U HeuschmannInstitute for Clinical Epidemiology and Biometry, Julius-Maximilian University Würzburg, Würzburg, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

To date, there is no validated telephone version of the Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire (KCCQ) available to collect data about health-related quality of life among patients with heart failure (HF). We assessed the reliability of the German KCCQ administered via telephone in comparison to the self-administered version. Patients with HF admitted to the outpatient clinic of the University Hospital Würzburg were consecutively identified and recruited. Patients completed (a) the self-administered version of the KCCQ, and (b) the telephone-based interview performed by trained raters. The sequence of both approaches was randomized. For the between-method agreement, the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) was calculated using a non-parametric, rank-based approach. We analysed data from sixty-one HF patients. The median KCCQ overall summary score was 84.8 (interquartile range (IQR) 71.6-76.9). The test-retest reliability between the self-administered and the telephone interview showed good agreement for the total symptom score, the clinical score and the overall summary core: ICC 0.75, 95 % confidence interval (CI) 0.72-0.79; ICC 0.80, CI 0.77-0.84; ICC 0.83, CI 0.80-0.86, respectively. The German KCCQ administered via telephone showed good test-retest reliability, indicating its applicability to collect data about health status among HF patients over the phone.

Indexed as

CardiomyopathiesHeart FailureQuality of LifeTelephoneAgedFemaleGermanyHumansMaleMiddle AgedReproducibility of ResultsSurveys and QuestionnairesHeart failureKCCQQuality of lifeReliability

Identifiers

PMID40760086
PMCPMC12322219

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.