ArticleScientific reports2025
Reliability of a German version of the Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire (KCCQ) administered via telephone.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- HI-PLUS: design of a cluster-randomized trial evaluating structured case management with telemonitoring to improve quality of life in heart failure.Clinical research in cardiology : official journal of the German Cardiac Society · 2026Trial
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
To date, there is no validated telephone version of the Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire (KCCQ) available to collect data about health-related quality of life among patients with heart failure (HF). We assessed the reliability of the German KCCQ administered via telephone in comparison to the self-administered version. Patients with HF admitted to the outpatient clinic of the University Hospital Würzburg were consecutively identified and recruited. Patients completed (a) the self-administered version of the KCCQ, and (b) the telephone-based interview performed by trained raters. The sequence of both approaches was randomized. For the between-method agreement, the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) was calculated using a non-parametric, rank-based approach. We analysed data from sixty-one HF patients. The median KCCQ overall summary score was 84.8 (interquartile range (IQR) 71.6-76.9). The test-retest reliability between the self-administered and the telephone interview showed good agreement for the total symptom score, the clinical score and the overall summary core: ICC 0.75, 95 % confidence interval (CI) 0.72-0.79; ICC 0.80, CI 0.77-0.84; ICC 0.83, CI 0.80-0.86, respectively. The German KCCQ administered via telephone showed good test-retest reliability, indicating its applicability to collect data about health status among HF patients over the phone.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.