Trial reportScientific reports2025
Set configuration influences cardiovascular responses to resistance exercise in postmenopausal females in a randomized crossover trial from the CARE project.
Trial report in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Exercise-induced neuropeptidergic and neurochemical neuroadaptation in stress regulation and emotional disorders.Acta neurologica Belgica · 2026Review
- Cardiovascular adaptations to resistance training with different set configurations in postmenopausal women: a study protocol for a randomised controlled trial (CARE project).BMJ open sport & exercise medicine · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
This study evaluated the acute cardiovascular responses to resistance exercise (RE) sessions with different set configurations in normotensive and hypertensive postmenopausal females. 50 physically active postmenopausal females performed a control (CON) and three RE sessions matched for total volume (144 repetitions), load (12-repetition maximum load), and total rest time (360s) but differing in set configuration: 4 sets of 9 repetitions with 120 s rest (9 S); 6 sets of 6 repetitions with 72 s rest (6 S); and 9 sets of 4 repetitions with 45 s rest (4 S). Heart rate (HR) was recorded during exercise, while HR variability, baroreflex sensitivity, arterial stiffness, and blood pressure were assessed before and after each session. Peak and mean HR values were higher during exercise in 9 S (p ≤ 0.026). All RE protocols induced cardiac parasympathetic withdrawal, reduction in baroreflex sensitivity, and increased post-exercise arterial stiffness compared to CON. However, in 4 S, cardiac parasympathetic withdrawal and baroreflex impairment were attenuated without a significant increase in arterial stiffness. Additionally, a post-exercise hypotensive response was observed only after 9 S in hypertensive participants (p = 0.004). Shorter set configurations attenuate chronotropic response during RE and mitigate impairments in cardiac autonomic and baroreflex control following RE sessions, without affecting arterial stiffness or blood pressure.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.