ArticleScientific reports2025
Unraveling global malaria incidence and mortality using machine learning and artificial intelligence-driven spatial analysis.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Explainable Machine Learning for Predicting Global Malaria Incidence From 2000 to 2022 With Climatic and Extreme Weather Conditions Across 78 Endemic Countries: A Retrospective Ecological Study.Health science reports · 2026Article
- Spatiotemporal patterns of climate-sensitive vector-borne diseases in Bangladesh: leveraging machine learning and spatial regression for intervention strategies.BMC medicine · 2026Article
- District-Level Dengue Early Warning Prediction System in Bangladesh Using Hybrid Explainable AI and Bayesian Deep Learning.Tropical medicine and infectious disease · 2026Article
- Leveraging explainable artificial intelligence and spatial analysis for communicable diseases in Asia (2000-2022) based on health, climate, and socioeconomic factors.International journal of health geographics · 2025Article
- Reflections on explainable artificial intelligence for predicting dengue outbreaks in Bangladesh.Global epidemiology · 2025Article
- Review of selected mosquito-borne diseases: arboviruses (dengue, chikungunya, Zika, West Nile, Japanese encephalitis, yellow fever) and parasitic diseases (malaria, lymphatic Filariasis).Frontiers in public health · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Malaria remains a significant global health concern, contributing to substantial morbidity and mortality worldwide. To inform efforts aimed at alleviating the global malaria burden, this study utilized spatial analysis, advanced machine learning (ML), and explainable AI (XAI) to identify high-risk areas, uncover key determinants, predict disease outcomes, and establish causal relationships. This study analyzed data from 106 countries between 2000 and 2022, sourced from the World Health Organization, World Bank and UNICEF. A high-performance ML classifier, XGBoost, combined with XAI and causal AI (CAI) techniques was employed to evaluate malaria incidence and mortality. Spatial autocorrelation analyses, such as Getis-Ord Gi* and Moran's I, were utilized to detect significant geographical clusters and hotspots of malaria. In 2022, malaria cases reached 251.75 million, while the peak of malaria-related fatalities occurred in 2020, totaling 99,554. Nigeria recorded the highest malaria incidence (1,332.99 million), followed by the Democratic Republic of the Congo (623.16 million) and India (319.83 million). South Sudan (149,753), Zambia (143,546), and the Central African Republic (124,801) exhibited the highest malaria mortality rates. High-incidence clusters were observed in Benin, Burkina Faso, and Ghana, with substantial mortality clusters in Benin, the Central African Republic, and Liberia. The XGBoost model demonstrated the best predictive performance for malaria incidence and mortality (RMSE = 0.63, r² = 0.93, adjusted r² = 0.92, and MAE = 0.46). The XAI and CAI methodologies identified key determinants of malaria, such as access to basic sanitation, electricity availability, population growth, and the under-5 mortality rate. Our integrated framework, driven by machine learning and artificial intelligence, offers actionable insights for identifying determinants and hotspots of malaria through spatial analysis. The study advocates for the incorporation of AI-driven spatial models into national malaria surveillance systems to facilitate evidence-based and targeted interventions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.