Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40760048›Full record

ArticleCommunications medicine2025

Gated recurrent unit with decay has real-time capability for postoperative ileus surveillance and offers cross-hospital transferability.

Xiaoyang Ruan, Sunyang Fu, Heling Jia, Kellie L Mathis, Cornelius A Thiels, Schaeferle M Gavin, Patrick M Wilson, Curtis B Storlie, Hongfang Liu

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Communications medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Xiaoyang RuanMcWilliams School of Biomedical Informatics, University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, Houston, TX, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0006-7085-744X
Sunyang FuMcWilliams School of Biomedical Informatics, University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, Houston, TX, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1691-5179
Heling JiaDepartment of Artificial Intelligence & Informatics, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, NY, USA.
Kellie L MathisDepartment of Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, NY, USA.
Cornelius A ThielsDepartment of Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, NY, USA.
Schaeferle M GavinDepartment of Quantitative Health Sciences, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, NY, USA.
Patrick M WilsonDepartment of Quantitative Health Sciences, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, NY, USA.
Curtis B StorlieDepartment of Quantitative Health Sciences, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, NY, USA.
Hongfang LiuMcWilliams School of Biomedical Informatics, University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, Houston, TX, USA. hongfang.liu@uth.tmc.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2570-3741

Funding

Secondary use of EMRs for surgical complication surveillanceR01EB019403 · NIBIB · MAYO CLINIC ROCHESTER · PI LIU, HONGFANG, STORLIE, CURTIS · 2015 to 2022
$3.8M
Cancer Prevention and Research Institute of Texas (Cancer Prevention Research Institute of Texas) RR230020NIBIB NIH HHS R01 EB019403
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIleus, a postoperative complication after colorectal surgery, increases morbidity, costs, and hospital stays. Assessing risk of ileus is crucial, especially with the trend towards early discharge. Prior studies assessed risk of ileus with regression models, the role of deep learning remains unexplored.

methodsWe evaluated the Gated Recurrent Unit with Decay (GRU-D) for real-time ileus risk assessment in 7349 colorectal surgeries across three Mayo Clinic sites with two Electronic Health Record (EHR) systems. The results were compared with atemporal models on a panel of benchmark metrics.

resultsHere we show that despite extreme data sparsity (e.g., 72.2% of labs, 26.9% of vitals lack measurements within 24 h post-surgery), GRU-D demonstrates improved performance by integrating new measurements and exhibits robust transferability. In brute-force transfer, AUROC decreases by no more than 5%, while multi-source instance transfer yields up to a 2.6% improvement in AUROC and an 86% narrower confidence interval. Although atemporal models perform better at certain pre-surgical time points, their performance fluctuates considerably and generally falls short of GRU-D in post-surgical hours.

conclusionsGRU-D's dynamic risk assessment capability is crucial in scenarios where clinical follow-up is essential, warranting further research on built-in explainability for clinical integration.

Identifiers

PMID40760048
PMCPMC12322181

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.