ArticleScientific reports2025
Multilingual sentiment analysis in restaurant reviews using aspect focused learning.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- BERT based sentiment analysis of consumer hesitancy toward solar energy adoption.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- CLAS-Net: A study on cross-lingual intelligent sentiment analysis model fusing semantic alignment.PloS one · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Cross-cultural sentiment analysis in restaurant reviews presents unique challenges due to linguistic and cultural differences across regions. The purpose of this study is to develop a culturally adaptive sentiment analysis model that improves sentiment detection across multilingual restaurant reviews. This paper proposes XLM-RSA, a novel multilingual model based on XLM-RoBERTa with Aspect-Focused Attention, tailored for enhanced sentiment analysis across diverse cultural contexts. We evaluated XLM-RSA on three benchmark datasets: 10,000 Restaurant Reviews, Restaurant Reviews, and European Restaurant Reviews, achieving state-of-the-art performance across all datasets. XLM-RSA attained an accuracy of 91.9% on the Restaurant Reviews dataset, surpassing traditional models such as BERT (87.8%) and RoBERTa (88.5%). In addition to sentiment classification, we introduce an aspect-based attention mechanism to capture sentiment variations specific to key aspects like food, service, and ambiance, yielding aspect-level accuracy improvements. Furthermore, XLM-RSA demonstrated strong performance in detecting cultural sentiment shifts, with an accuracy of 85.4% on the European Restaurant Reviews dataset, showcasing its robustness to diverse linguistic and cultural expressions. An ablation study highlighted the significance of the Aspect-Focused Attention, where XLM-RSA with this enhancement achieved an F1-score of 91.5%, compared to 89.1% with a simple attention mechanism. These results affirm XLM-RSA's capacity for effective cross-cultural sentiment analysis, paving the way for more accurate sentiment-driven insights in globally distributed customer feedback.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.