ArticleJournal of orthopaedic surgery and research2025
Machine learning prediction of early reoperation following lower extremity tumor resection and endoprosthetic reconstruction: A PARITY trial secondary analysis.
Article in Journal of orthopaedic surgery and research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundOncologic resection and endoprosthetic reconstruction of malignant bone tumors carries a high risk of complication and secondary surgery. Given the significant morbidity associated with reoperation in systemically compromised patients, accurate risk stratification is critical to patient counseling and shared decision-making. The purpose of this study was to develop a machine learning (ML) model for prediction of reoperation within one year of lower extremity tumor resection and endoprosthetic reconstruction.
methodsUsing data from the PARITY trial, 54 features across 604 lower extremity endoprosthetic reconstructions were evaluated as predictors of all-cause reoperation within one year. Logistic regression (LR), Random Forest, gradient boosting, AdaBoost, and XGBoost were used for model building. Standard metrics of area under receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC), area under the precision-recall curve (AUPRC), and Brier scores were used to evaluate model performance. Important features for the top-performing model were determined.
resultsOf 604 lower extremity endoprosthetic reconstructions performed in the study period, 155 patients (25.7%) underwent at least one reoperation. The Gradient Boosting model had the highest discrimination (AUROC = 0.817, AUPRC = 0.690) of the tested models and was well-calibrated. Surgical site infection (SSI), operative time, white race, negative pressure wound therapy (NPWT) use, and female sex were the five most important features for model performance.
conclusionsWe report a well-calibrated ML-driven algorithm with high discriminatory power for the prediction of all-cause early reoperation following lower extremity tumor resection and endoprosthetic reconstruction. Preventing SSI remains paramount to avoiding the morbidity of reoperation after complex oncologic limb salvage surgeries.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.