ArticleBMC cardiovascular disorders2025
Observations in incorporating lung ultrasound views into the echo lab: value in decompensated heart failure.
Article in BMC cardiovascular disorders, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundAlthough lung ultrasound (LUS) can detect specific findings in decompensated congestive heart failure (dCHF), it is largely unavailable to hospitalized patients outside of point-of-care ultrasound practice. Therefore, we sought to determine if 4 lung views added value to echocardiography and whether LUS could be performed expeditiously in an inpatient echo lab.
methodsConsecutive inpatient echo studies from a 300-bed community hospital included two posterobasal and two anteroapical lung views and were retrospectively reviewed for: (1) echo parameters including EF < 40%, E/e'>13, pseudonormal E/A ratio, among others, of which the presence of any one parameter defined an abnormal echocardiogram, Echo+, and (2) LUS bilateral findings of 3-or-more B-lines or pleural effusion defined an abnormal lung study, LUS+. Patient charts were reviewed for the clinical diagnosis of dCHF as the reference standard. Diagnostic accuracies were determined for Echo, LUS, and their combination in predicting dCHF by univariate and area under the receiver-operating characteristic (AUC) analyses. The time necessary to perform the LUS was recorded.
resultsOf n = 129 inpatients, mean (±SD) patient age was 67.0 ± 16.3 years, 57% were male, 32/129 (25%) had dCHF. LUS + was present in 65/129 (50%) and was related to dCHF (p < 0.0001). Despite the high 91% sensitivity of Echo + alone, the addition of LUS findings improved specificity from 49 to 89% and accuracy from 60 to 84%. Lung imaging views required only 95 s ± 42 [range: 30-227] to perform.
conclusionsThe addition of 4 simple lung views to the standard echocardiogram improves diagnostic accuracy for decompensated CHF without increasing imaging resources. These pilot data support integrating lung ultrasound with standard echocardiography for healthcare delivery in hospital settings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.