ArticleBMC plant biology2025
Optimizing in vitro slow-growth conservation media for garlic under ambient conditions: further implications for core set accessions.
Article in BMC plant biology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundGarlic is a bulbous crop exhibiting sufficient variations in morpho-biochemical characteristics. The entire garlic germplasm is conserved through clonal propagation at a field gene bank and thus prone to climatic changes’ effects. Therefore, maintaining the crop’s genetic diversity in a suitable alternative form is crucial. The current study standardized the protocol for slow-growth conservation of garlic (in vitro) at an ambient temperature. Plantlet regeneration through the shoot meristem was subjected to 21 treatments with three osmoticum, namely sucrose (1, 2, 3, and 4%), sorbitol (2 and 4%), and mannitol (2 and 4%), alone or in combination, including the control, at an ambient temperature in 2 × 21 factorial design. Furthermore, the identified treatment was validated using a core set of garlic accessions (46) to study the genetic response to in vitro slow-growth conservation.
resultA pooled analysis revealed significant differences in the response of two garlic varieties, Bhima Omkar and Bhima Purple, to varying concentrations and combinations of three osmotic agents (p < 0.05). Over time, substantial shooting, rooting, and plant status changes were observed. However, treatment interaction effects showed no significant variation (P ≥ 0.05). In the first month of conservation, treatments with sucrose alone (1% sucrose, 2% sucrose, 3% sucrose, and 4% sucrose) recorded healthier and quicker growth, whereas those with sorbitol and mannitol alone resulted in slower growth. The same growth pattern was recorded in the third month of conservation, except that the survival rate of the plantlets decreased. Media in the sucrose-only treatments dried up sooner than those in the other media combinations. At 6 months, among the 21 medium combinations tested, Murashige and Skoog’s medium supplemented with 4% sucrose and 2% sorbitol demonstrated significantly favorable delayed growth under ambient temperature conditions (25 °C ± 2), achieving a 90–92% survival rate of plantlets, outperforming other treatments. A total of 46 garlic core set accessions were cultured in the specified medium. After 1 year of conservation with two subcultures at 6-monthintervals, growth parameters, including mortality (%), plant status, and shoot and root growth, were assessed. The plant status data revealed genotypic variability, grouping the accessions into three categories containing 19, 15, and 12 genotypes, respectively. These groups were ranked in descending order based on plant status, shoot and root growth, and mortality. Genetic purity analysis using three ILP primers indicated no significant molecular-level changes.
conclusionThis protocol presents an efficient, cost-effective, and scalable approach for the slow-growth conservation of diverse garlic genotypes using osmotic agents. Beyond minimizing natural deterioration during in vivo field gene bank, it also enables the identification of osmotic stress-tolerant genotypes, which hold promise as potential parental lines in breeding programs targeting drought resilience.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.