Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40759896›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2025

Optimization of antibacterial and antifungal activities in Moroccan saffron by-products using mixture design and simplex centroid methodology.

Abdellah Baraich, Amine Elbouzidi, Naoufal El Hachlafi, Mohamed Taibi, Mounir Haddou, Sanae Baddaoui, Reda Bellaouchi, Mohamed Addi, Redouane Benabbes, Abdeslam Asehraou and 4 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors.

Abdellah BaraichLaboratory of Bioresources, Biotechnology, Ethnopharmacology and Health, Faculty of Sciences, Mohammed First University, Boulevard Mohamed VI, B.P. 717, 60000, Oujda, Morocco. abdellah.baraich@ump.ac.ma.
Amine ElbouzidiLaboratoire d'Amélioration des Productions Agricoles, Biotechnologie et Environnement (LAPABE), Faculté des Sciences, Université Mohammed Premier, 60000, Oujda, Morocco.
Naoufal El HachlafiFaculty of Medicine and Pharmacy, Ibn Zohr University, 81000, Guelmim, Morocco.
Mohamed TaibiLaboratoire d'Amélioration des Productions Agricoles, Biotechnologie et Environnement (LAPABE), Faculté des Sciences, Université Mohammed Premier, 60000, Oujda, Morocco.
Mounir HaddouLaboratoire d'Amélioration des Productions Agricoles, Biotechnologie et Environnement (LAPABE), Faculté des Sciences, Université Mohammed Premier, 60000, Oujda, Morocco.
Sanae BaddaouiLaboratory of Bioresources, Biotechnology, Ethnopharmacology and Health, Faculty of Sciences, Mohammed First University, Boulevard Mohamed VI, B.P. 717, 60000, Oujda, Morocco.
Reda BellaouchiLaboratory of Bioresources, Biotechnology, Ethnopharmacology and Health, Faculty of Sciences, Mohammed First University, Boulevard Mohamed VI, B.P. 717, 60000, Oujda, Morocco.
Mohamed AddiLaboratoire d'Amélioration des Productions Agricoles, Biotechnologie et Environnement (LAPABE), Faculté des Sciences, Université Mohammed Premier, 60000, Oujda, Morocco.
Redouane BenabbesLaboratory of Bioresources, Biotechnology, Ethnopharmacology and Health, Faculty of Sciences, Mohammed First University, Boulevard Mohamed VI, B.P. 717, 60000, Oujda, Morocco.
Abdeslam AsehraouLaboratory of Bioresources, Biotechnology, Ethnopharmacology and Health, Faculty of Sciences, Mohammed First University, Boulevard Mohamed VI, B.P. 717, 60000, Oujda, Morocco.
Bassem JaouadiLaboratoire des Biotechnologies Microbiennes et Enzymatiques et de Biomolécules (LBMEB), Centre de Biotechnologie de Sfax (CBS), Université de Sfax, Route Sidi Mansour Km 6, B.P. 1177, 3018, Sfax, Tunisia.
Ammar Al-FargaDepartment of Biochemistry, Faculty of Science, University of Jeddah, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia.
Saleh M Al-MaaqarDepartment of Biology, Faculty of Education, Albaydha University, Al-Baydha, Yemen. al-maaqar@baydaauniv.net.
Ennouamane SaalaouiLaboratory of Bioresources, Biotechnology, Ethnopharmacology and Health, Faculty of Sciences, Mohammed First University, Boulevard Mohamed VI, B.P. 717, 60000, Oujda, Morocco.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The health risks associated with synthetic preservatives have intensified the search for natural antimicrobial alternatives. Crocus sativus L. (saffron) generates abundant by-products, such as tepals and leaves, which are rich in bioactive compounds with demonstrated antimicrobial potential. Compared to other natural alternatives, saffron by-products offer distinct advantages, including a unique combination of phenolic compounds (e.g., ellagic acid, rutin) and carotenoids (e.g., crocin) that act synergistically against both Gram-positive and Gram-negative bacteria, as well as fungi. Additionally, these by-products represent a sustainable solution, with approximately 63 kg of agricultural waste generated per kg of saffron spice. This study optimized the antibacterial and antifungal efficacy of saffron extracts using a simplex centroid mixture design. Phytochemical analysis using high-performance liquid chromatography with diode-array detection (HPLC-DAD) identified key antimicrobial compounds, including ellagic acid (68.43% in leaves, 50.31% in tepals) and crocin (9.59% in stigmas). Antimicrobial assays against Staphylococcus aureus, Escherichia coli, Candida albicans, and Geotrichum candidum revealed that stigma extracts exhibited superior antibacterial activity (MIC = 25 mg/mL for S. aureus and E. coli), while tepal and leaf extracts showed promising antifungal effects (MIC = 12.5 mg/mL for G. candidum). The mixture design approach uncovered synergistic interactions, with an equimolar combination of stigma, tepal, and leaf extracts (33:33:33) demonstrating the strongest antibacterial activity (MIC = 25 mg/mL) and a ternary mixture (34% stigma, 30% leaf, 36% tepal) achieving the lowest antifungal MIC (6.25 mg/mL). These findings highlight saffron by-products as highly effective and sustainable natural antimicrobials, providing a cost-efficient (40-60% reduction compared to conventional extracts) and multi-functional alternative to synthetic preservatives. Their dual functionality (antimicrobial + natural coloring) and agricultural waste origin make them particularly valuable for industrial applications in food preservation, pharmaceuticals, and biopharmaceuticals. The integration of statistical modeling maximizes their potential, meeting the growing demand for safe, natural antimicrobial solutions with clear competitive advantages.

Indexed as

Anti-Bacterial AgentsAntifungal AgentsCrocusPlant ExtractsBacteriaCarotenoidsFungiMicrobial Sensitivity TestsMoroccoPhytochemicalsPlant LeavesAnti-Bacterial AgentsAntifungal AgentsCarotenoidsPhytochemicalsPlant ExtractsAntibacterial activityBiopharmaceuticalsBy-productsCrocus sativus L.Experimental mixture designFood preservation

Identifiers

PMID40759896
PMCPMC12322218

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.