SynthesisJournal of clinical psychology2025
Interpersonal Problems and Their Mental Health Correlates: A Meta-Analytic Review.
Synthesis in Journal of clinical psychology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Within-person longitudinal associations between depressive symptoms and interpersonal problems in adolescent girls.Journal of child psychology and psychiatry, and allied disciplines · 2026Article
- Dynamic Network Characteristics of Adolescent Mental Health Symptoms: Gender and Grade Differences Based on a Cross-Lagged Panel Network Model.Behavioral sciences (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Identifying stressors and coping resources among Austrian farmers: A mixed-methods study for targeted prevention and health promotion.Preventive medicine reports · 2026Article
- Who's at risk for emergent depression years later? Predictive modeling in a nine-year longitudinal cohort.BMC psychiatry · 2026Article
- The mediating role of physical exercise in the relationship between university students' interpersonal disturbance and conflict resolution strategies.Frontiers in psychology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Interpersonal relationships have long been considered fundamental to understanding mental health and psychological functioning. Among various aspects of these relationships, interpersonal problems seem particularly significant in relation to mental health. This meta-analytic review aims to summarize the associations between interpersonal problems and multiple domains of mental health based on naturalistic, observational data from both clinical and nonclinical populations. Focusing on studies using the Inventory of Interpersonal Problems (IIP), we examined the cross-sectional associations between interpersonal problems and general psychological distress, depressive symptoms, symptoms of anxiety, positive and negative emotions, well-being, and perceived stress. A three-level meta-analytic model was employed to account for the nested data structure, and moderator analyses examined differences between clinical and nonclinical samples. Across all domains, 120 effect sizes from 66 studies were included. Significant positive correlations emerged between interpersonal problems and general psychological distress (r = 0.565, p < 0.001), depression (r = 0.473, p < 0.001), anxiety (r = 0.454, p < 0.001), and negative emotions (r = 0.486, p < 0.001). In contrast, significant negative correlations were found with positive emotions (r = -0.224, p = 0.010) and well-being (r = -0.372, p = 0.004). There were too few studies available to meta-analyze perceived stress. Clinical status did not significantly moderate these associations, suggesting that the observed associations are relatively consistent across populations. These findings underscore the relevance of interpersonal problems, as measured by the IIP, for understanding mental health and provide evidence-based estimates of these associations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.