Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40759834›Full record

ArticleHealth economics review2025

Cost-benefit analysis of the quarantine policy during the outbreak of the Covid-19 virus in Iran.

Morteza Tahamipour Zarandi, Kimia Haghbandeh

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Health economics review, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Morteza Tahamipour ZarandiFaculty of Economics and Political Sciences, Shahid Beheshti University, Daneshjou Blvd., Tehran, 1983963113, Iran. m_tahami@sbu.ac.ir.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9109-5153
Kimia HaghbandehFaculty of Economics and Political Sciences, Shahid Beheshti University, Daneshjou Blvd., Tehran, 1983963113, Iran.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe outbreak of COVID-19 posed significant health and economic challenges worldwide, prompting governments to implement various containment measures, including quarantine policies. This study examines the cost-benefit analysis of Iran's quarantine policy during the pandemic, evaluating its economic impact, public health outcomes, and overall effectiveness. The research explores the direct and indirect costs of quarantine, including reduced economic activity, government expenditures, and social consequences, while assessing the benefits in terms of lives saved, healthcare system relief, and long-term economic stability. Findings suggest that while quarantine measures imposed substantial financial burdens, they played a crucial role in controlling the virus's spread and preventing a greater economic and human toll. The study highlights the necessity of balancing public health interventions with economic sustainability, offering insights for future pandemic response strategies.

methodsThis study has used the cost-benefit analysis method. In the financial evaluation, benefits such as the reduction of fuel costs, gratuitous payments, and the benefit of credits paid to employees have been compared to expenses such as the average cost of corona treatment in the hospital and at home for the population of employees who have contracted the disease. Also, in the economic evaluation, the benefits of reducing electricity costs and food for employees, the willingness of people to pay the government for protective measures, and reducing overtime payments to employees compared to costs such as food for hospitalized employees, paying subsidies to employees and reducing GDP Has been studied.

resultsApplication of quarantine is optimal from the view of government employees (financial point of view) with a benefit-cost ratio of 1.98, and the government's point of view (economic point of view) is cost-effective with a benefit-cost ratio of 2.68.

conclusionsThese results indicate that applying quarantine for employees benefits both the people and the government. Thus, the results of this study can be a guide for policymakers in managing similar disasters or the spread of other strains of the Coronavirus in the future.

Indexed as

Benefit–Cost analysisCoronavirusGovernmentIranNet present valueQuarantine

Identifiers

PMID40759834
PMCPMC12323177

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.