ArticlePediatric nephrology (Berlin, Germany)2025
Machine learning-based prediction of circuit clotting during pediatric continuous kidney replacement therapy sessions.
Article in Pediatric nephrology (Berlin, Germany), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Artificial intelligence in pediatric nephrology: current applications and emerging frameworks for evidence generation.Pediatric nephrology (Berlin, Germany) · 2026Review
- Kidney Support Therapy: Recent Advances.Indian journal of pediatrics · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundContinuous kidney replacement therapy (CKRT) is commonly used for managing acute kidney injury (AKI) in critically ill pediatric patients. However, unexpected circuit clotting remains a frequent complication, resulting in therapy interruptions, blood loss, and increased clinical workload. Timely prediction of clotting could enhance circuit management and patient outcomes.
methodsWe retrospectively analyzed de-identified data from 23 pediatric patients undergoing 101 CKRT sessions at a tertiary PICU between 2012 and 2017. Time-series data were collected from CKRT machines and patient records, including demographic, clinical, and treatment-related variables. A machine learning (ML) classification model was developed to predict clotting events 60 min before occurrence. The dataset was preprocessed and split into training (70%) and validation (30%) sets, preserving class balance. Feature selection was performed using LightGBM, and model performance was evaluated using the Extra Trees classifier with cross-validation.
resultsOf 101 CKRT sessions, 59 ended due to clotting. After data cleaning and exclusion of sessions shorter than 60 min, 88 sessions and over 218,000 data points were analyzed. The final model achieved an AUROC of 0.99 in the training set and performed well in validation, predicting clotting events 60 min in advance in 148 instances. The most important predictive features included effluent volume, treatment duration, fluid removal, and dialysate flow.
conclusionThis study demonstrates that ML can effectively predict circuit clotting during pediatric CKRT, offering a valuable tool for early clinical intervention. Integration of predictive algorithms into clinical workflows may help reduce complications, optimize treatment continuity, and improve outcomes for critically ill children.
Indexed as
Identifiers
40759823What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.