ArticleMagma (New York, N.Y.)2026
On the measurement errors in SAR supervision introduced by directional couplers.
Article in Magma (New York, N.Y.), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
introductionThis study proposes a framework for determining the calculation error in online SAR supervision introduced by directional couplers. MATERIALS AND
methodsA mathematical framework is introduced showing how the error in the measured excitation vector compared to the actual excitation vector can be rewritten as a new set of virtual observation points (VOPs). By comparing the new set of VOPs to the original VOPs through an optimization, the maximum underestimation of SAR can be calculated. The framework is then applied to five different RF arrays.
resultsThe results show that the error in SAR calculation is very dependent on the position of the reference plane of the directional coupler measurements and the S-parameters of the array. To have an error of less than 5%, directional couplers with a directivity better than 40 dB are necessary for the worst case of the investigated arrays. DISCUSSION: The framework presented in this paper provides an approach for calculating a safety factor to account for the inaccuracies introduced by directional coupler measurements in online SAR supervision. The framework can also be adapted to other types of measurements.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.