Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40759800›Full record

ReviewMedizinische Klinik, Intensivmedizin und Notfallmedizin2025

[Future-oriented further development and approaches to "individualised" cardiopulmonary resuscitation].

Simon Weißler, Clemens Kill, Matthias Fischer, Jürgen Knapp, Christian Jung, Peter Kienbaum, Daniel Scheyer, Michael Bernhard

Erratum issuedAbstract readEnglish AbstractReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Medizinische Klinik, Intensivmedizin und Notfallmedizin, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

  • Erratum issued
    2025
5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Simon WeißlerZentrale Notaufnahme, Universitätsklinikum Düsseldorf, Heinrich-Heine-Universität, Moorenstraße 5, 40225, Düsseldorf, Deutschland.
Clemens KillZentrum für Notfallmedizin, Universitätsmedizin Essen, Essen, Deutschland.
Matthias FischerKlinik für Anästhesiologie und Intensivmedizin, ALB FILS Klinikum, Göppingen, Deutschland.
Jürgen KnappKlinik für Anästhesiologie und Schmerztherapie, Universitätsspital Bern, Inselspital, Bern, Schweiz.
Christian JungKlinik für Kardiologie, Pneumologie und Angiologie, Universitätsklinikum Düsseldorf, Heinrich-Heine-Universität, Düsseldorf, Deutschland.
Peter KienbaumKlinik für Anästhesiologie, Universitätsklinikum Düsseldorf, Heinrich-Heine-Universität, Düsseldorf, Deutschland.
Daniel ScheyerZentrale Notaufnahme, Universitätsklinikum Düsseldorf, Heinrich-Heine-Universität, Moorenstraße 5, 40225, Düsseldorf, Deutschland.
Michael BernhardZentrale Notaufnahme, Universitätsklinikum Düsseldorf, Heinrich-Heine-Universität, Moorenstraße 5, 40225, Düsseldorf, Deutschland. michael.bernhard@uni-duesseldorf.de.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Resuscitation research plays a crucial role in improving survival rates and neurological outcomes following cardiac arrest. This review highlights essential aspects of current resuscitation research and examines the integration of various treatment approaches into existing resuscitation protocols, with a particular focus on individualized resuscitation. The current literature on several key topics in resuscitation is presented. High-quality chest compressions are a central quality feature of cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR). Capnography is a proven tool for quantifying hemodynamics during CPR. Diastolic blood pressure (DBP) appears to be a superior parameter compared to end-tidal carbon dioxide, as it reflects coronary perfusion more precisely. Target values for diastolic blood pressure (DBP) should >25 mmHg, as they correlate with improved survival rates and better neurological outcomes. Continuous administration of adrenaline and fluids can increase DBP and improve the chances of return of spontaneous circulation. Additionally, ultrasound, particularly transesophageal echocardiography, can help identify the optimal compression point for chest compressions, thereby increasing CPR effectiveness. Pulse checks are not optimally suited for detecting cardiac arrest or return of spontaneous circulation and prolong the "no-flow" time. A significantly better alternative may be the use of ultrasound for pulse checks. If conventional resuscitation fails, extracorporeal CPR can be considered.

Indexed as

Cardiac arrestCompression pointeCPRPoint-of-care ultrasoundTransesophageal echocardiography

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.