Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40759729›Full record

SynthesisScientific reports2025

Global spread and antimicrobial resistance of Aeromonas hydrophila in aquatic food animals: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Saharuetai Jeamsripong, Justice Opare Odoi, Manoj Kumar Shahi, Saran Anuntawirun, Nawaphorn Roongrojmongkhon, Anyarat Thiptara

Abstract readSystematic ReviewMeta-Analysis
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Genomic insights intoFrontiers in microbiology · 2026
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Antibiotic resistance inFrontiers in microbiology · 2026
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Transcriptional regulatory factorFrontiers in microbiology · 2025
    Article
  10. Insights of bacterial community structure and occurrence of antibiotic resistance and antimicrobial compounds in an urban stream in the megacity of São Paulo, Brazil.The Brazilian journal of infectious diseases : an official publication of the Brazilian Society of Infectious Diseases
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Saharuetai JeamsripongResearch Unit in Microbial Food Safety and Antimicrobial Resistance, Department of Veterinary Public Health, Faculty of Veterinary Science, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok, Thailand. Saharuetai.j@chula.ac.th.
Justice Opare OdoiDepartment of Veterinary Public Health, Faculty of Veterinary Science, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok, Thailand.
Manoj Kumar ShahiDepartment of Veterinary Public Health, Faculty of Veterinary Science, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok, Thailand.
Saran AnuntawirunDepartment of Veterinary Public Health, Faculty of Veterinary Science, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok, Thailand.
Nawaphorn RoongrojmongkhonDepartment of Veterinary Public Health, Faculty of Veterinary Science, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok, Thailand.
Anyarat ThiptaraVeterinary Research and Development Center (Upper Southern Region), Thung-Song, Nakhon-Si-Thammarat, Thailand.

Funding

The national Research Council of Thailand (NRCT) N42A660897
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Aeromonas hydrophila is a common zoonotic agent in aquatic environments that causes gastroenteritis and wound infections in both humans and animals through foodborne and hospital-acquired infection. Antimicrobial resistance (AMR) combination with virulence factors enhances treatment challenging. The prevalence and AMR of Aeromonas hydrophila have been increasingly reported, posing a significant threat to both animal and public health. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to determine the prevalence of A. hydrophila and its resistance to aquatic food animals. A comprehensive search for relevant studies was conducted on Google Scholar, PubMed, ScienceDirect, and Scopus, following the PRISMA guidelines, covering studies from January 2020 to December 2024. The quality of the included publications was evaluated using the Joanna Briggs Institute critical appraisal tool. Differences in the prevalence and AMR of A. hydrophila were assessed using a random-effect model. A total of 14,077 studies were screened, and 14 publications were included. Bacterial isolation of A. hydrophila was achieved using various standard protocols, involving culture on Rimler-Shotts (RS) agar and Tryptic Soy Agar (TSA), with or without antimicrobials. Subsequent biochemical identification confirmed the isolates. The pool prevalence of A. hydrophila (30.7%, 95% C.I.:17.0-46.3%), and the distribution of virulence genes were 71.2%. The most common resistance observed to penicillin (80.7%), oxytetracycline (69.9%) and macrolides (67.8%). The most prevalent AMR genes identified were bla

Indexed as

Aeromonas hydrophilaDrug Resistance, BacterialGram-Negative Bacterial InfectionsAnimalsAnti-Bacterial AgentsHumansAnti-Bacterial AgentsAeromonas hydrophillaAntimicrobial resistanceESBLMultidrug resistanceVirulence factors

Identifiers

PMID40759729
PMCPMC12322169

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.