ArticleScientific reports2025
Infants' neural processing of emotional faces after ostracism.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Can You Feel My Pain? Neural-Behavioural Changes in Caregiver-Infant Dyads During Ostracism.Developmental science · 2026Article
- Mapping EEG Metrics to Human Affective and Cognitive Models: An Interdisciplinary Scoping Review from a Cognitive Neuroscience Perspective.Biomimetics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- The Stress of Being Left Out: Physiological and Behavioral Responses to Ostracism in Preverbal Infants.Infancy : the official journal of the International Society on Infant StudiesArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Ostracism, a stressful experience that threatens human psychological needs, such as self-esteem and sense of belonging, significantly affects adults' processing of social cues at both the neurophysiological and behavioral levels. However, research about the effects of ostracism on infants remains extremely scarce. The current study investigated how self-experienced ostracism and inclusion influence the neural response of 13-month-old infants (N = 36; 53% males; mostly White) to emotional faces. Infants were included or ostracized in a live triadic ball-tossing game and subsequently presented with dynamic emotional faces (i.e., happy, fearful, and angry faces) while their electroencephalographic (EEG) activity was recorded. Results revealed that ostracism altered infants' neural responses. Ostracized infants displayed heightened attention to all emotional faces, as evidenced by an enhanced Nc component, reflecting increased attentional allocation to social cues compared to included participants. Furthermore, unlike included infants, ostracized ones exhibited reduced sensorimotor activity in response to all emotions. Importantly, ostracized infants also manifested increased negative affect and engagement behaviors during the triadic interaction. Overall, these findings highlight an early sensitivity to ostracism, demonstrating its impact on infants' neural processing of emotional faces, possibly affecting their ability to navigate complex social interactions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.