Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40759672›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2025

Accelerating RRT* convergence with novel nonuniform and uniform sampling approach.

Sivasankar Ganesan, Mohanraj Thangamuthu, Balakrishnan Ramalingam, Madan Mohan Rayguru, Sethu Narayanan Tamilselvan

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Sivasankar GanesanDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, Amrita School of Engineering, Coimbatore, Amrita Vishwa Vidyapeetham, Coimbatore, India.
Mohanraj ThangamuthuDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, Amrita School of Engineering, Coimbatore, Amrita Vishwa Vidyapeetham, Coimbatore, India.
Balakrishnan RamalingamSchool of Electronics Engineering, Vellore Institute of Technology, Chennai, India. balakrishnan.r@vit.ac.in.
Madan Mohan RayguruLouisville Automation and Robotics Research Institute, University of Louisville, Louisville, KY, USA.
Sethu Narayanan TamilselvanSingapore University of Technology and Design, Singapore, Singapore.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Path planning plays a crucial role in autonomous mobile robotics. Sampling-based path planners are widely and frequently employed to generate collision-free paths between a start and goal location. Due to its asymptotic optimality, the optimal rapidly-exploring random tree (RRT*) algorithm is the most widely used among these. However, its reliance on uniform sampling often results in slow convergence. To address this issue, this work proposes a novel hybrid sampling method called RRT*-NUS (nonuniform-uniform sampler), which combines both uniform and nonuniform sampling to improve exploration efficiency. The proposed RRT*-NUS method is evaluated against six baseline algorithms: RRT*, Informed RRT*, RRT*-N (normal sampling RRT*), GS-RRT* (goal-oriented sampling RRT*), DR-RRT* (directional random sampling RRT*), and hybrid-RRT* in three different 384*384 2D simulation scenarios. The numerical simulation results indicate that the proposed RRT*-NUS surpasses the baseline RRT* algorithms in terms of planning time and convergence. It outperforms RRT* by 67.5% and Hybrid RRT* by 54% in time performance. Additionally, it achieves a convergence rate of 0.41 units/s, which is 3× faster than RRT* and almost 2× faster than Hybrid RRT*.

Indexed as

Autonomous mobile robotNavigationNonuniform–uniform samplerPath planningRRT*

Identifiers

PMID40759672
PMCPMC12322225

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.