ArticleScientific reports2025
Prediction of uniaxial compressive strength of limestone from ball mill grinding characteristics using supervised machine learning techniques.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It has been retracted, and should not be counted. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- A lightweight neural network approach for predicting national Gross Domestic Product (LightNet-GDP) with regression benchmarks.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Influences of organic nitrogen application ratio on oil content in flue-cured tobacco based on field experiments and a random forest model.Frontiers in plant science · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
- Retracted
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Uniaxial Compressive Strength (UCS) is a fundamental parameter in rock engineering, governing the stability of foundations, slopes, and underground structures. Traditional UCS determination relies on laboratory tests, but these face challenges such as high-quality core sampling, sample preparation difficulties, high costs, and time constraints. These limitations have driven the adoption of indirect approaches for UCS prediction. This study introduces a novel indirect method for predicting uniaxial compressive strength, harnessing the grinding characteristics of a ball mill as predictive variables through supervised machine learning techniques. The correlation between grinding characteristics and UCS was examined to determine whether a linear relationship exists between them. A hybrid support vector machine-recursive feature elimination (SVM-RFE) algorithm is applied to identify the critical grinding parameters influencing UCS. Four supervised machine learning models viz., Multiple Linear Regression (MLR), k-Nearest Neighbor Regression (k-NNR), Support Vector Regression (SVR), and Random Forest Regression (RFR) were developed for UCS prediction, with hyperparameter optimization performed using RandomisedSearchCV technique. The Random Forest model outperformed others as the best prediction model, achieving a coefficient of determination (R²) of 0.95, followed by SVR (R² = 0.87), k-NNR (R² = 0.82), and MLR (R² = 0.758). Model robustness was further assessed using Mean Absolute Error (MAE), Root Mean Square Error (RMSE), and Variance Accounted For (VAF). Internal validation by means of K-fold cross validation and external validation with independent datasets confirmed generalization capability, showing an average prediction error of ± 10%. The findings demonstrate that combining grinding characteristics with machine learning offers an accurate, cost-effective alternative to conventional UCS testing, with significant practical applications in rock engineering.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.