Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40759590›Full record

ReviewThe world journal of men's health2026

Testosterone Replacement Therapy in Hypogonadal Men with a Prostate Cancer Diagnosis: A British Society for Sexual Medicine Consensus Statement.

Marie Alexandra Edison, Michael Kirby, Geoffrey Ian Hackett

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in The world journal of men's health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Marie Alexandra EdisonBURST Research Collaborative, London, UK. m.a.edison@doctors.org.uk.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4636-5251
Michael KirbyBritish Society for Sexual Medicine, Staffordshire, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5429-7714
Geoffrey Ian HackettAston University Medical School, Birmingham, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2073-3001

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Hypogonadism in men with a history of prostate cancer presents a complex clinical challenge, with longstanding concerns that testosterone replacement therapy (TRT) could potentially stimulate cancer recurrence or progression. This paper provides an up-to-date review of the evidence on the safety and efficacy of TRT, focusing on its use in key clinical scenarios such as active surveillance, post-radical prostatectomy, and post-radiotherapy. We examine the latest data on oncological safety, including risks of disease progression and biochemical recurrence, alongside the benefits of TRT in addressing hypogonadal symptoms such as fatigue, mood disturbance, and sexual dysfunction. The discussion also considers how TRT safety aligns with advancements in prostate cancer biology, including the saturation model, and how these insights are reflected in guidelines from major organisations such as the British Society for Sexual Medicine (BSSM), American Urological Association (AUA), and European Association of Urology (EAU). Gaps in long-term data and areas for further research are identified, underscoring the need for careful application in clinical practice. This paper emphasises a multidisciplinary approach in patient selection, rigorous monitoring protocols, and fully informed decision-making. By presenting a comprehensive review of the evidence, we aim to clarify the role of TRT in improving quality of life for men in remission from prostate cancer, while ensuring that oncological safety remains the highest priority.

Indexed as

Androgen replacement therapyHypogonadismProstatic neoplasmsTestosteroneTherapeutics

Identifiers

PMID40759590
PMCPMC12798415

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.