ReviewThe world journal of men's health2026
Testosterone Replacement Therapy in Hypogonadal Men with a Prostate Cancer Diagnosis: A British Society for Sexual Medicine Consensus Statement.
Review in The world journal of men's health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Hypogonadism in men with a history of prostate cancer presents a complex clinical challenge, with longstanding concerns that testosterone replacement therapy (TRT) could potentially stimulate cancer recurrence or progression. This paper provides an up-to-date review of the evidence on the safety and efficacy of TRT, focusing on its use in key clinical scenarios such as active surveillance, post-radical prostatectomy, and post-radiotherapy. We examine the latest data on oncological safety, including risks of disease progression and biochemical recurrence, alongside the benefits of TRT in addressing hypogonadal symptoms such as fatigue, mood disturbance, and sexual dysfunction. The discussion also considers how TRT safety aligns with advancements in prostate cancer biology, including the saturation model, and how these insights are reflected in guidelines from major organisations such as the British Society for Sexual Medicine (BSSM), American Urological Association (AUA), and European Association of Urology (EAU). Gaps in long-term data and areas for further research are identified, underscoring the need for careful application in clinical practice. This paper emphasises a multidisciplinary approach in patient selection, rigorous monitoring protocols, and fully informed decision-making. By presenting a comprehensive review of the evidence, we aim to clarify the role of TRT in improving quality of life for men in remission from prostate cancer, while ensuring that oncological safety remains the highest priority.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.