ReviewJournal for immunotherapy of cancer2025
Artificial intelligence-based digital pathology using H&E-stained whole slide images in immuno-oncology: from immune biomarker detection to immunotherapy response prediction.
Review in Journal for immunotherapy of cancer, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed.
- Immunohistochemical Surrogates for Molecularly Defined Renal Tumors.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- In silico models in oncology, neurology, and epidemiology: systems-level and multiscale perspectives.NPJ systems biology and applications · 2026Review
- Spatial Biomarker Deep Learning Model Predicts Response to PI3K Inhibition in Head and Neck Cancer.Cancers · 2026Article
- Peripheral blood IFN-γ-producing T-cell subsets and soluble IL-2 receptor as independent prognostic biomarkers in NSCLC treated with immune checkpoint inhibitor-based therapy.Discover oncology · 2026Article
- Digital Pathology in Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma: Translational Advances and Clinical Integration for Pathologists, Oncologists, and Surgeons.Head and neck pathology · 2026Review
- Mucinous histology and resistance to immune checkpoint blockade in patients with microsatellite instability-high metastatic colorectal cancer.The oncologist · 2026Article
- Immunotherapy rechallenge in gastric cancer: resistance mechanisms, molecular stratification, and precision decision-making.Frontiers in immunology · 2026Review
- Artificial intelligence for biomarker prediction in gastric cancer: from histopathology to multimodal integration.Frontiers in oncology · 2026Review
- Causal AI for cancer immunotherapy: a narrative framework review of target trial emulation, treatment-effect learning and clinical translation.Frontiers in immunology · 2026Review
- TNM staging of esophageal cancer using fine-tuned pathology foundation models and multiple instance learning.Frontiers in oncology · 2026Article
- Deep learning-based assessment of PD-L1 expression in NSCLC predicts outcome for patients treated with anti-PD-1 immunotherapy.Frontiers in immunology · 2026Article
- Impact of Cytokeratin 19 Expression on the Outcomes of Unresectable Hepatocellular Carcinoma Treated with Targeted Therapy and Immunotherapy: A Propensity Score Matched Analysis.Journal of hepatocellular carcinoma · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
15 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Immuno-oncology and the advent of immunotherapies, in particular immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs), have fundamentally altered the way we treat cancer. Yet only a small subset of patients actually responds to ICIs, and many face significant adverse effects, making the accurate selection of patients for ICIs essential to the work of immuno-oncology. Immune biomarkers, such as programmed death-ligand 1, microsatellite instability/defective mismatch repair, and tumor mutational burden have been developed for patient selection and stratification for ICIs, though their predictive abilities remain limited. This is due to several challenges: lack of adequate tissue sampling, the time-consuming and subjective nature of manual visual-based quantification techniques, and the growing recognition of the complexity of the tumor microenvironment, for which these tests cannot fully capture on their own. Meanwhile, emerging technologies in the field of artificial intelligence (AI), such as the performance of deep learning techniques in digital pathology, have garnered significant attention for their potential to be used in this space. Many have now turned their attention towards the immuno-oncology-related applications for digital pathology, particularly in analyzing whole-slide images of widely available H&E-stained slides to aid in immune biomarker detection and ICI response prediction. In this review, we discuss the current landscape of AI-based digital pathology in immuno-oncology, including its applications for identifying and measuring immune biomarkers and, importantly, its potential for predicting ICI response and survival outcomes. We will end by discussing the challenges and future directions of adopting AI technologies for clinical deployment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.