Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40759410›Full record

ArticleBone & joint open2025

Avoidable and unavoidable delays in hip fracture surgery : a prospective observational study of who, what, and why?

Mitchell Sarkies, Nicholas Murphy, Ramya Kunnath, Seth Tarrant, Erica Epstein, Natasha Weaver, Cameron R Hemmert, Zsolt J Balogh

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Bone & joint open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Mitchell SarkiesSchool of Health Sciences, Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia.
Nicholas MurphyDepartment of Traumatology, John Hunter Hospital, Newcastle, Australia.
Ramya KunnathOrthopaedic Trauma Department, John Hunter Hospital, Newcastle, Australia.
Seth TarrantDepartment of Traumatology, John Hunter Hospital, Newcastle, Australia.
Erica EpsteinGeriatrics Department, John Hunter Hospital, Newcastle, Australia.
Natasha WeaverSchool of Medicine and Public Health, University of Newcastle, Newcastle, Australia.
Cameron R HemmertSchool of Health Sciences, Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia.
Zsolt J BaloghDepartment of Traumatology, John Hunter Hospital, Newcastle, Australia.

Funding

National Health and Medical Research Council
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Aims: Surgical management of hip fracture is often delayed, which is associated with increased mortality. We aimed to prospectively determine the proportion of potentially avoidable delay to surgery beyond 48 hours, and its causes, as clinically relevant margins for quality improvement. Methods: A 12-month prospective cohort study from September 2022 to September 2023 was conducted on all 427 hip fracture surgery patients aged ≥ 50 years who were admitted to a trauma centre in New South Wales, Australia. The reasons for delay, medical speciality, and level of seniority initiating the decision, and what response was taken after the delay, were recorded for each case delayed beyond 48 hours from hospital admission. Surgical delays were categorized as either avoidable or unavoidable independently by surgical and medical experts. Results: From 427 hip fractures, 37% (160/427) had surgery beyond 48 hours, with 29% (124/427) considered avoidable, 6% (27/427) unavoidable, and 2% (9/427) unable to be categorized. Patients experienced a median 43-hour time to surgery (IQR 27 to 63): 30 hours (IQR 24 to 41) for non-delayed, 69 hours (IQR 55 to 93) for avoidable, and 75 hours (IQR 59 to 135) for unavoidable delays. Patients with unavoidable delays had higher American Society of Anesthesiologists grades and acute ward length of stay. Limited operating theatre availability was responsible for 60% of delays (96/160), of which 92% (88/96) were considered avoidable. Orthopaedic trauma operating theatre access was compromised (operating theatre unavailable) for 86% of hip fracture surgery delays that were due to limited operating theatre availability. Reasons unrelated to operating theatre availability accounted for 35% of delays (56/160). It was not possible to categorize 5% of delays (8/160). Conclusion: Most hip fracture surgery delays are due to limited operating theatre availability. Of the delays, 78% were considered avoidable, representing a margin for improvement of 55% for operating theatre availability, and 23% unrelated to operating theatre availability.

Identifiers

PMID40759410
PMCPMC12321406

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.