Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40759349›Full record

ArticleJournal of advanced research2026

Dynamic molecular landscape in dorsal root ganglion for peripheral nerve regeneration promoted by tissue engineered nerve graft.

Hui Zhu, Siyuan Xu, Yiting Wang, Ying Wang, Qiuwen Sun, Muyuan Tong, Tianyi Huang, Yulin Pan, Qi Guo, Xiaokun Gu and 3 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of advanced research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Hui ZhuResearch Center of Clinical Medicine, Affiliated Hospital of Nantong University, Key Laboratory of Neuroregeneration of Jiangsu and Ministry of Education, Co-innovation Center of Neuroregeneration, NMPA Key Laboratory for Research and Evaluation of Tissue Engineering Technology Products, Nantong University, Nantong, JS 226001, PR China.
Siyuan XuMedical School of Nantong University, Nantong, JS 226001, PR China; Department of Neurology, Affiliated Hospital of Nantong University, Nantong, JS 226001, PR China.
Yiting WangMedical School of Nantong University, Nantong, JS 226001, PR China; Department of Neurology, Affiliated Hospital of Nantong University, Nantong, JS 226001, PR China.
Ying WangMedical School of Nantong University, Nantong, JS 226001, PR China; Department of Neurology, Affiliated Hospital of Nantong University, Nantong, JS 226001, PR China.
Qiuwen SunMedical School of Nantong University, Nantong, JS 226001, PR China; Department of Neurology, Affiliated Hospital of Nantong University, Nantong, JS 226001, PR China.
Muyuan TongMedical School of Nantong University, Nantong, JS 226001, PR China; Department of Neurology, Affiliated Hospital of Nantong University, Nantong, JS 226001, PR China.
Tianyi HuangMedical School of Nantong University, Nantong, JS 226001, PR China.
Yulin PanMedical School of Nantong University, Nantong, JS 226001, PR China.
Qi GuoDepartment of Hand and Foot Surgery, China-Japan Union Hospital of Jilin University, Key Laboratory of Peripheral Nerve Injury and Regeneration of Jilin Province, Department of Hand and Foot Surgery, The Third Bethune Hospital of Jilin University, Changchun, JL 130033, PR China.
Xiaokun GuResearch Center of Clinical Medicine, Affiliated Hospital of Nantong University, Key Laboratory of Neuroregeneration of Jiangsu and Ministry of Education, Co-innovation Center of Neuroregeneration, NMPA Key Laboratory for Research and Evaluation of Tissue Engineering Technology Products, Nantong University, Nantong, JS 226001, PR China; Medical School of Nantong University, Nantong, JS 226001, PR China; Department of Hand and Foot Surgery, Affiliated Hospital of Nantong University, Nantong, JS 226001, PR China. Electronic address: gxk20@163.com.
Xi XuResearch Center of Clinical Medicine, Affiliated Hospital of Nantong University, Key Laboratory of Neuroregeneration of Jiangsu and Ministry of Education, Co-innovation Center of Neuroregeneration, NMPA Key Laboratory for Research and Evaluation of Tissue Engineering Technology Products, Nantong University, Nantong, JS 226001, PR China; Medical School of Nantong University, Nantong, JS 226001, PR China; Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, Affiliated Hospital of Nantong University, Nantong JS 226001, PR China. Electronic address: xuxijessica@163.com.
Hongkui WangResearch Center of Clinical Medicine, Affiliated Hospital of Nantong University, Key Laboratory of Neuroregeneration of Jiangsu and Ministry of Education, Co-innovation Center of Neuroregeneration, NMPA Key Laboratory for Research and Evaluation of Tissue Engineering Technology Products, Nantong University, Nantong, JS 226001, PR China. Electronic address: wanghongkui@ntu.edu.cn.
Chengbin XueResearch Center of Clinical Medicine, Affiliated Hospital of Nantong University, Key Laboratory of Neuroregeneration of Jiangsu and Ministry of Education, Co-innovation Center of Neuroregeneration, NMPA Key Laboratory for Research and Evaluation of Tissue Engineering Technology Products, Nantong University, Nantong, JS 226001, PR China. Electronic address: xue_chengbin@hotmail.com.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionThe limited regenerative capacity of the nervous system represents a significant clinical challenge in the context of peripheral nerve injuries. An innovative strategy for sciatic nerve repair has been developed using tissue-engineered nerve grafts (TENGs) composed of skin-derived precursor Schwann-like cells (SKP-SCs) and a silk fibroin-chitosan scaffold. However, the reason why SKP-SCs-TENG demonstrated superior enhanced nerve regeneration compared to the autograft and scaffold groups remains unclear.

objectivesThe present work aims to elucidate the superiority and molecular mechanisms underlying TENG repairs.

methodsWe conducted a comprehensive transcriptomic analysis of the rat dorsal root ganglia (DRG, L4-L6). A range of key processes were examined, including apoptosis, proliferation, migration, inflammation, the immune response, axonal outgrowth and myelination. To further elucidate the mechanism, LC-MS/MS analysis of SKP-SCs conditioned medium and RNA sequencing of cocultured DRG neurons were carried out.

resultsPost-implantation analyses demonstrated enhanced nerve regeneration, as evidenced by molecular data from gene set enrichment analysis and real-time PCR. A bioinformatics analysis including causal network analysis, upstream regulators prediction, and protein-protein interaction network analysis identified several candidate secreted proteins, including neurotrophic and pro-regenerative factors, which were mapped to key signaling pathways implicated in nerve repair. The results of the co-culture experiments with DRG neurons provided direct evidence of the paracrine effects of SKP-SCs, which enhanced neuronal survival and outgrowth. Bioinformatics analysis on RNA sequencing of DRG neurons further highlighted the molecular pathways that were modulated by the secreted factors of SKP-SCs.

conclusionThis integrated approach demonstrates the potential of combining biomaterial scaffolds, cellular therapy, and omics technologies for developing effective strategies to repair peripheral nerve injuries. The findings provide a robust preclinical foundation for advancing TENG-based therapies toward clinical application.

Indexed as

Ganglia, SpinalNerve RegenerationPeripheral Nerve InjuriesTissue EngineeringAnimalsChitosanGene Expression ProfilingMaleRatsRats, Sprague-DawleySchwann CellsTissue ScaffoldsChitosanDorsal root gangliaGene set enrichment analysisPeripheral nerve regenerationSkin-derived precursorsSKP-SCsTissue engineering

Identifiers

PMID40759349
PMCPMC13131438

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.