Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40758876›Full record

ArticleProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America2025

Rapid, interpretable data-driven models of neural dynamics using recurrent mechanistic models.

Thiago B Burghi, Maria Ivanova, Ekaterina Morozova, Huaxinyu Wang, Eve Marder, Timothy O'Leary

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Rapid, interpretable data-driven models of neural dynamics using recurrent mechanistic models.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025
    Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Thiago B BurghiDepartment of Engineering, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, CB2 1PZ, United Kingdom.
Maria IvanovaDepartment of Biology, Brandeis University, Waltham, MA 02454.
Ekaterina MorozovaDepartment of Biology, Brandeis University, Waltham, MA 02454.
Huaxinyu WangDepartment of Engineering, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, CB2 1PZ, United Kingdom.
Eve MarderDepartment of Biology, Brandeis University, Waltham, MA 02454.ORCID 0000-0001-9632-5448
Timothy O'LearyDepartment of Engineering, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, CB2 1PZ, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-1029-0158

Funding

Neuromodulation and Robustness of Neurons and NetworksR35NS097343 · NINDS · BRANDEIS UNIVERSITY · PI MARDER, EVE E · 2017 to 2024
$7.8M
HHS | NIH | National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (NINDS) R35 NS 097343Kavli Foundation (Kavli) G118028NINDS NIH HHS R35 NS097343
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Obtaining predictive models of a neural system is notoriously challenging. Detailed models suffer from excess model complexity and are difficult to fit efficiently. Simplified models must negotiate a tradeoff between tractability, predictive power, and ease of interpretation. We present a modeling paradigm for estimating predictive, mechanistic models of neurons and small circuits that navigates these issues using methods from systems theory. The key insight is that membrane currents can be modeled using two scalable system components optimized for learning: linear state space models, and nonlinear artificial neural networks. Combining these components, we construct two types of membrane currents: lumped currents, which are flexible, and data-driven conductance-based currents, which are interpretable. The resulting class of models-which we call recurrent mechanistic models (RMMs)-can be trained in a matter of seconds to minutes on intracellular recordings during an electrophysiology experiment, representing a step change in performance over previous approaches. As a proof-of-principle, we use RMMs to learn the dynamics of two groups of neurons, and their synaptic connections, in the Stomatogastric Ganglion, a well-known central pattern generator. Due to their reliability, efficiency, and interpretability, RMMs enable qualitatively new kinds of experiments using predictive models in closed-loop neurophysiology and online estimation of neural properties in living preparations.

Indexed as

Models, NeurologicalNeural Networks, ComputerNeuronsAnimalsbiophysical modelscentral pattern generatorselectrophysiologymachine learningneural dynamics

Identifiers

PMID40758876
PMCPMC12358897

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.