ArticleJournal of developmental and behavioral pediatrics : JDBP
Comparison of Available Tools to Screen for Autism at 12 and 15 Months.
Article in Journal of developmental and behavioral pediatrics : JDBP. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Autism Screening in the First Year and Beyond: Comparison of Multiple Measures.Autism research : official journal of the International Society for Autism Research · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveTo determine the performance of autism screeners at 12 and 15 months of age.
methodsChildren were screened either at 12- (n = 1473) or 15-month (n = 1227) primary care visits. Children were screened with both the Infant/Toddler Checklist (ITC) and the First Year Inventory-Lite (FYI-L) at 12 months and FYI-L and the Modified Checklist for Autism in Toddlers, Revised with Follow-Up (M-CHAT-R/F) at 15 months. After a positive screen and/or clinical concern, families were offered a no-cost diagnostic evaluation.
resultsOf the 1473 toddlers screened at 12 months, 223 screened positive and 107 attended a diagnostic evaluation. Of the 1227 children screened at 15 months, 252 screened positive and 94 attended the evaluation. Overall, specificity for autism was high (>0.94) for all screeners at 12 and 15 months. At 12-month screening, sensitivity for autism was low on the ITC (0.26) and moderate on the FYI-L (0.67). Positive predictive value (PPV) was low for both screeners (0.24 for ITC and FYI-L). At 15 months, both the FYI-L and the M-CHAT-R/F demonstrated moderate sensitivity (0.61 for FYI-L and 0.60 for the M-CHAT-R/F) and low PPV (0.16 for FYI-L and 0.31 for M-CHAT-R/F).
conclusionAlthough data do not support universal screening at younger ages, the study identifies tools that can be used at 12 and 15 months. Importantly, screening at these ages does not identify all cases of autism, and repeat screening at 18 months and beyond is essential to support autism detection as early as possible.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.