Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40758864›Full record

ArticleProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America2025

Three decades of declines restructure butterfly communities in the Midwestern United States.

Wendy Leuenberger, Jeffrey W Doser, Michael W Belitz, Leslie Ries, Nick M Haddad, Wayne E Thogmartin, Elise F Zipkin

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Wendy LeuenbergerDepartment of Integrative Biology, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI 48824.ORCID 0000-0001-6567-9913
Jeffrey W DoserDepartment of Forestry and Environmental Resources, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC 27607.ORCID 0000-0002-8950-9895
Michael W BelitzDepartment of Integrative Biology, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI 48824.
Leslie RiesDepartment of Biology, Georgetown University, Washington, DC 20057.
Nick M HaddadDepartment of Integrative Biology, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI 48824.ORCID 0000-0002-1591-9322
Wayne E ThogmartinUnited States Geological Survey, Upper Midwest Environmental Sciences Center, La Crosse, WI 54603.
Elise F ZipkinDepartment of Integrative Biology, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI 48824.ORCID 0000-0003-4155-6139

Funding

DOI | U.S. Geological Survey (USGS) G21AC10369-00Michigan State University (MSU) UDF Nat SciNational Science Foundation (NSF) DBI-1954406National Science Foundation (NSF) NSF-1828149
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Insects are declining worldwide. These declines have been documented across taxonomic groups and are worrisome given ecosystem services provided by insects. Long-term data have illuminated butterfly declines across geographic regions. However, critical questions remain on how butterfly declines are distributed across species and functional groups, limiting effective conservation. Here, we show unprecedented changes in butterfly biodiversity resulting from 32 y of species levels declines throughout the Midwestern United States. No species increased over the three-decade study period and abundance declined across every functional group (e.g., rare, common, migratory, resident; annual mean trend: -0.9 to -2.3% per year). Species richness declined across all but one functional group, with concomitant increases in evenness (e.g., abundance among species) in several groups resulting from steeper losses in abundance for common species (abundance: -1.9% per year; richness: -0.04% per year) as compared to rare species (abundance: -0.9% per year; richness: -1.33% per year). Our results paint a bleaker picture than other butterfly studies likely due to our long time series of data and ability to include rare species. Such widespread declines undoubtedly affect other trophic levels and ecosystem services. Focusing risk assessments and management interventions only on rare species is likely to be insufficient given broad declines across species, which have fundamentally restructured butterfly communities in the region. As such, conservation efforts should shift focus to species assemblages and entire communities when possible.

Indexed as

BiodiversityButterfliesAnimalsConservation of Natural ResourcesEcosystemMidwestern United StatesPopulation Dynamicsbiodiversityinsect declineintegrated community modelLepidoptera

Identifiers

PMID40758864
PMCPMC12377735

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.