Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40758748›Full record

ArticlePLoS neglected tropical diseases2025

Multi-contrast machine learning improves schistosomiasis diagnostic performance.

María Díaz de León Derby, Charles B Delahunt, Ethan Spencer, Jean T Coulibaly, Kigbafori D Silué, Isaac I Bogoch, Anne-Laure Le Ny, Daniel A Fletcher

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLoS neglected tropical diseases, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

María Díaz de León DerbyDepartment of Bioengineering, University of California, Berkeley, Berkeley, California, United States of America.
Charles B DelahuntGlobal Health Labs, Inc, Bellevue, Washington, United States of America.
Ethan SpencerGlobal Health Labs, Inc, Bellevue, Washington, United States of America.
Jean T CoulibalyUFR Biosciences, Université Félix Houphouët-Boigny, Abidjan, Côte d'Ivoire.
Kigbafori D SiluéUFR Biosciences, Université Félix Houphouët-Boigny, Abidjan, Côte d'Ivoire.
Isaac I BogochDivision of General Internal Medicine, Toronto General Hospital, University Health Network, Toronto, Canada.
Anne-Laure Le NyGlobal Health Labs, Inc, Bellevue, Washington, United States of America.
Daniel A FletcherDepartment of Bioengineering, University of California, Berkeley, Berkeley, California, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0002-1890-5364

Funding

Gates Foundation INV-008782
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Schistosomiasis currently affects over 250 million people and remains a public health burden despite ongoing global control efforts. Conventional microscopy is a practical tool for diagnosis and screening of Schistosoma haematobium, but identification of eggs requires a skilled microscopist. Here we present a machine learning (ML)-based strategy for automated detection of S. haematobium that combines two imaging contrasts, brightfield (BF) and darkfield (DF), to improve diagnostic performance. We collected BF and DF images of urine samples, many of them containing S. haematobium eggs, during two different field studies in Côte d'Ivoire using a mobile phone-based microscope, the SchistoScope. We then trained separate egg-detection ML models and compared the patient-level performance of BF and DF models alone to combinations of BF and DF models, using annotations from trained microscopists as the gold standard. We found that models trained on DF images, and almost all BF and DF combinations, performed significantly better than models trained on BF images only. When models were trained on images from the first field study (n = 349 patients, 748 images of each contrast), patient-level classification performance on patient images from the second study (n = 375 patients, 752 images of each contrast) met the WHO Diagnostic Target Product Profile (TPP) sensitivity and specificity for the monitoring and evaluation use case (sensitivity for all models and combinations was >75% when evaluated at a confidence score threshold that resulted in specificity >96.5%). When we used images from both field studies for the training set, performance of the models was improved. Overall, this work shows that the use of DF and BF increases the performance of ML models on images from devices with low-cost optics, while retaining the portability, power, and time-to-results of the WHO's diagnostic TPP. DF requires no additional sample preparation and does not increase the complexity of the imaging system. It thus offers a practical means to improve performance of automated diagnostics for S. haematobium as well as other microscopy-based diagnostics.

Indexed as

Machine LearningMicroscopySchistosoma haematobiumSchistosomiasis haematobiaAdultAnimalsCote d'IvoireFemaleHumansMaleSensitivity and Specificity

Identifiers

PMID40758748
PMCPMC12334053

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.