ArticlePLOS global public health2025
Non-communicable disease care for persons living with HIV in Peru: A national physician cross-sectional study.
Article in PLOS global public health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Exploring barriers and facilitators for non-communicable disease care for persons living with HIV in Peru through a socioecological framework: HIV physician and coordinator perspectives.PLOS global public health · 2026Article
- A Review of Chronic Comorbidities in People Living With HIV in Peru.Journal of the International Association of Providers of AIDS CareReview
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Non-communicable diseases (NCDs) are a significant cause of morbidity and mortality for the aging HIV population worldwide. In Peru, no data exists on how providers address NCDs for persons living with HIV (PLWH). This study examines HIV physician confidence and current management practices for NCDs for PLWH in Peru. We recruited public-sector HIV physicians via Peru's National HIV, STI and Hepatitis Program's (NHSTIHP) physician registry and by program coordinator referral. Participants completed a telephone survey encompassing seven NCDs [hyperlipidemia, hypertension, diabetes, osteoporosis, sarcopenia, non-AIDS defining cancers, neurocognitive impairment (NCI)] and three modifiable risk factors (obesity, tobacco, and alcohol use). Survey domains included: (1) provider and practice characteristics (2) NCDs encountered, (3) provider confidence in prevention, diagnosis, and treatment (based upon a four-point Likert scale), (4) screening frequency and management approaches (free response). We obtained contact information from 167 physicians working with the NHSTIHP, and 78 (47%) volunteered to participate (mean age 45.8 ± 9.3 years; 26% women; 78% infectious disease trained) across 23 of the 25 regions of Peru. The majority (>50%) of physicians reported at least one patient with: hyperlipidemia, hypertension, diabetes, NCI, cervical cancer, obesity, tobacco, and/or alcohol use. Physicians felt most confident independently managing metabolic disorders (hyperlipidemia, diabetes, hypertension, obesity), and least confident with NCI and sarcopenia. Most physicians (>50%) would manage the NCDs, although management approaches differed. NCD screening that was part of the NHSTIHP National HIV care guidelines was more consistently performed than screening beyond the scope of the existing guidelines. Peruvian HIV physicians encounter NCDs in their patient population and manage these conditions and risk factors despite variable confidence and/or knowledge of best practices. This study highlights opportunities for expanding physician education, addressing systems-level barriers to NCD care, and the need for locally relevant, epidemiologically-based, HIV-specific NCD care guidelines.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.