Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40758725›Full record

Observational studyPloS one2025

Healthcare utilization associated with antimicrobial resistance at a tertiary hospital in Vietnam: A retrospective observational study from 2016 to 2021.

Nga Thi-Quynh Nguyen, Nhien Phan-Thuy Nguyen, Quynh Thuy Truong, Thao Phuong Huynh, Hong-Nguyen Tran-Thi, Minh Van Hoang, Hai-Yen Nguyen-Thi

Abstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Nga Thi-Quynh NguyenDepartment of Pharmaceutical Administration, University of Medicine and Pharmacy at Ho Chi Minh City, Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam.
Nhien Phan-Thuy NguyenDepartment of Pharmaceutical Administration, University of Medicine and Pharmacy at Ho Chi Minh City, Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5494-271X
Quynh Thuy TruongDepartment of Pharmacy, Hospital for Tropical Diseases, Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam.
Thao Phuong HuynhDepartment of Pharmacy, Hospital for Tropical Diseases, Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam.
Hong-Nguyen Tran-ThiDepartment of Pharmaceutical Administration, University of Medicine and Pharmacy at Ho Chi Minh City, Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam.
Minh Van HoangHanoi University of Public Health, Hanoi, Vietnam.
Hai-Yen Nguyen-ThiDepartment of Pharmaceutical Administration, University of Medicine and Pharmacy at Ho Chi Minh City, Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0000-4948-4294

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDespite the increasing burden of antimicrobial resistance (AMR), specifically on priority ESKAPE pathogens, studies examining the economic impact of AMR in low- and lower-middle-income countries have been scarce and require further investigation to optimize the post-COVID resource allocation.

objectivesTo quantify the incremental hospital costs and length of stay (LOS) associated with antimicrobial-resistant versus -susceptible among priority ESKAPE pathogens from the healthcare sector perspective.

methodsWe conducted a retrospective observational study of patients hospitalized at the Hospital for Tropical Diseases from 2016-2021 with non-duplicate isolates of any ESKAPE pathogens from clinical specimens. The patients were then stratified into resistant- and susceptible- groups by the WHO classification. Multivariate generalized linear regression and negative binomial regression with linear spline at COVID-19 occurrence were employed to evaluate the incremental hospital costs and LOS due to AMR, respectively. These regressions were adjusted for sociodemographic and clinical characteristics. We applied difference-in-difference (DiD) to estimate the differential cost between resistant and susceptible groups regarding COVID-19 change.

resultsDuring the six-year period, 4,197 out of 6,670 patients (62.92%) were isolated with priority pathogens, with the highest prevalence of priority pathogens observed in 3GCREC and MRSA (accounting for 45.63% and 25.33%, respectively). After covariate adjustments, the incremental hospital costs per resistant patient were significantly higher across most pathogens except for patients tested with MRSA results (average CRAB $3,980; CRPA $1,000; 3GCREC $444; 3GCRKP $1,942; MRSA -$326), while incremental LOS ranged from 1.40 days for 3GCREC (95%CI: 0.69-2.10 ) to 12.54 days for CRPA (95%CI: 11.12-13.97). COVID-19 significantly enlarged the hospital cost gaps between patients with antibiotic-resistant and antibiotic-susceptible profiles, with A.baumannii (CRAB vs. CSAB) showing the highest DiD at $9,116 (95%CI: $6,019-$12,213).

conclusionThe incremental hospital costs of AMR were significant, with the highest one observed in CRAB patients, and the difference between resistant and susceptible cases widened during the COVID-19 pandemic.

Indexed as

Drug Resistance, BacterialPatient Acceptance of Health CareTertiary Care CentersAdultAgedAnti-Bacterial AgentsCOVID-19FemaleHospital CostsHumansLength of StayMaleMethicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureusMiddle AgedRetrospective StudiesVietnamAnti-Bacterial Agents

Identifiers

PMID40758725
PMCPMC12321119

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.