ArticlePLoS computational biology2025
Integrating AlphaFold2 models and clinical data to improve the assessment of Short Linear Motifs (SLiMs) and their variants' pathogenicity.
Article in PLoS computational biology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Comprehensive evaluation of AlphaFold/OpenFold prediction of experimentally unresolved proteins through novel metrics.Briefings in bioinformatics · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Short Linear Motifs (SLiMs) are protein functionally relevant regions that mediate reversible protein-protein interactions. Variants that disrupt SLiMs can lead to numerous Mendelian diseases. Although various bioinformatic tools have been developed to identify SLiMs, most suffer from low specificity. In our previous work, we demonstrated that integrating sequence variant information with structural analysis can enhance the prediction of true functional SLiMs while simultaneously generating tolerance matrices that indicate whether each of the 19 possible single amino acid substitutions (SASs) is tolerated. However, the scarcity of representative crystallographic structures of SLiM-receptor complexes posed a significant limitation. In this study, we demonstrate that these interactions can be modeled using AlphaFold2 (AF2) to generate high-quality structures that serve as input for our MotSASi method. These AF2-derived structures show robust performance, both in reproducing known structures deposited in the Protein Data Bank (PDB) and in reflecting the deleterious effects of known sequence variants. This updated version of MotSASi expands the repertoire of high-confidence predicted SLiMs and provides a comprehensive catalog of variants located within SLiMs, along with their respective deleteriousness assessments. When compared to AlphaMissense, MotSASi demonstrates superior performance in predicting variant deleteriousness. By contributing to the accurate identification and interpretation of variants, this work aligns with ACMG/AMP standards and aims to improve diagnostic rates in clinical genomics.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.