ArticlePloS one2025
Prognostic prediction of dengue hemorrhagic fever in pediatric patients with suspected dengue infection: A multi-site study.
Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Dengue virus genetic diversity and lineage dynamics in Thailand: implications for surveillance and vaccine implementation.Virology journal · 2026Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
18 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Dengue virus (DENV) infection is a major global health problem. While DENV infection rarely results in serious complications, the more severe illness dengue hemorrhagic fever (DHF) has a significant mortality rate due to the associated plasma leakage that may lead to hypovolemic shock. Proper care thus requires identifying patients with DHF among those with suspected dengue so that they can be provided with adequate and prompt fluid replacement. In this study we used seventeen years of pediatric patient data from a prospective cohort study in two hospitals in Thailand to develop models to predict DHF among patients with suspected dengue infection. We produced models for a general hospital setting and for a primary care unit setting lacking lab facilities. The best model using combined data from both hospitals achieved an AUC of 0.90 for the general hospital setting and 0.79 for the primary care unit setting. We then investigated the generalizability of the models by training models with data from one hospital and testing them with data from the other. For some models, we found a significant reduction in performance. Possible sources of this are differences in how attributes are defined or measured and differences in the hematological parameters of the two patient populations. We conclude that while high accuracy prediction of DHF is possible, care must be taken when applying DHF predictive models from one clinical setting to another.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.