Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40758690›Full record

Observational studyPloS one2025

Incidental findings on non-contrast abdominal computed tomography in an asymptomatic population: Prevalence, economic and health implications.

Alexander Ritter, Maximilian Sabev, Olivier Bonny, Gregoire Wuerzner, Thomas Ernandez, Florian Buchkremer, Stephan Segerer, Daniel G Fuster, Beat Roth, Nilufar Mohebbi and 4 more

Abstract readObservational StudyMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors.

Alexander RitterDivision of Nephrology, University Hospital Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9049-0765
Maximilian SabevDivision of Nephrology, University Hospital Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.
Olivier BonnyService of Nephrology, University Hospital Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland.
Gregoire WuerznerService of Nephrology, University Hospital Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland.
Thomas ErnandezDivision of Nephrology and Transplantation, University Hospital Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland.
Florian BuchkremerDivision of Nephrology, Cantonal Hospital Aarau, Aarau, Switzerland.
Stephan SegererDivision of Nephrology, Cantonal Hospital Aarau, Aarau, Switzerland.
Daniel G FusterDepartment of Nephrology and Hypertension, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7220-1803
Beat RothDepartment of Urology, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7369-650X
Nilufar MohebbiDivision of Nephrology, University Hospital Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.
Lena JellestadDepartment of Consultation-Liaison Psychiatry and Psychosomatic Medicine, University Hospital Zurich, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.
Andreas M HoetkerInstitute of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Hospital Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.
Carsten A WagnerInstitute of Physiology, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.
Harald SeegerDivision of Nephrology, University Hospital Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1552-7983

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionIncreasing use of low-dose abdominal computed tomography (CT) scans in clinical diagnostics and research offers high sensitivity for kidney stones with minimal radiation exposure. However, due to reduced specificity, incidental findings potentially lead to unnecessary follow-up, financial burden, and psychological distress. Gaps of knowledge remain regarding the prevalence of incidental findings and their financial and psychological consequences. This study investigates the prevalence of incidental findings in asymptomatic participants undergoing low-dose non-contrast CT scans and their economic and psychological sequelae.

methodsWe conducted a retrospective, multicentric observational study using data from the assessment for the control group of the Swiss Kidney Stone Cohort (SKSC). Low-dose non-contrast CT scans were analyzed for incidental findings, cost and psychological impact. Statistical analyses evaluated participant characteristics, financial and psychological consequences.

results229 participants underwent low-dose non-contrast CT scans, with 112 correctly completing the psychological questionnaires. The mean age was 42.9 years, and 56.3% were male. Incidental findings were observed in 47.2% (n = 108) of participants, with 16.6% having multiple findings. Kidney-related findings were the most prevalent, accounting for 35% of all findings. Of the incidental findings, 37.9% were classified as "incidentalomas" by the American College of Radiology (ACR) guidelines, and 15.7% of participants had findings that warranted follow-up according to radiology reports. In terms of costs, follow-up procedures, including imaging, consultations, and surgeries, incurred a total expense of 44'988 CHF, averaging 1967 CHF per participant and 2'999 CHF per incidental finding requiring follow-up. Surgical interventions were necessary for three participants, with individual costs reaching up to 35'208 CHF. Psychological assessment revealed that emotional distress and level of concern significantly differed across resilience levels and categories of CT findings. Participants with high resilience demonstrated lower emotional distress and concern, while those with CT findings requiring follow-up exhibited higher distress. Emotional distress was significantly greater in participants with follow-up findings compared to those without.

conclusionsLow-dose non-contrast abdominal CT scans often reveal incidental findings. Follow-up tests and procedures incurred significant financial costs, occasionally even leading to unnecessary surgical or non-surgical interventions. Psychological assessments showed increased anxiety in participants requiring follow-up, particularly those with low resilience. Our findings highlight the need for improved management, patient information, and consideration of economic and psychological impacts of incidental findings in clinical research and routine in the future.

Indexed as

Incidental FindingsKidney CalculiRadiography, AbdominalTomography, X-Ray ComputedAdultAgedFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPrevalenceRetrospective Studies

Identifiers

PMID40758690
PMCPMC12321107

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.