ArticlePloS one2025
Effect of random terms on the shape of dendrites analyzed by the phase-field model.
Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
In this study, we focus on random terms with a significant effect on the calculation time and the sidebranch structure of dendrites. We quantitatively evaluate the effect of the random terms on dendrites by changing the term introduced into the evaluation equation, the distribution of the random term, and variance. We introduced the terms: [Formula: see text] and [Formula: see text]. In the phase-field equation, we use [Formula: see text] to represent interfacial noise. In the heat conduction equation, we use [Formula: see text] to represent thermal noise. We compare the results of calculation using only [Formula: see text] with those using only [Formula: see text] and analyze the effect of each random term introduced on the shape of dendrites. In terms of the probability distribution for generating random numbers, the uniform and Gaussian distributions are used for comparison. The magnitude of the noise Fu, which controls the variance of noise, is used with 3 or 4 patterns of values to the extent that the calculation results do not diverge. Each value of Fu differs by a factor of 10. Sidebranch length, contour length, and area are used as indices for evaluating dendrites. The succinonitril is used for comparing the simulation and experimental results for dendrites to design the optimal random number model. On the basis of the introduced terms, we clarify that each term requires a different order of the variance. The probability density function of random numbers does not affect the shape of dendrites. On the other hand, the calculation time which is used the random numbers following the uniform distribution is more than twice as fast as when using random numbers that follow a Gaussian distribution. The variance of a random term has the greatest effect on the shape of dendrites.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.