ArticleHuman vaccines & immunotherapeutics2025
Real-world single-center data analysis of dual immunotherapy in advanced NSCLC: Efficacy, survival, and adverse events.
Article in Human vaccines & immunotherapeutics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Efficacy of PD-1/PD-L1 plus CTLA-4 inhibitors in advanced/metastatic NSCLC: a meta-analysis based on RCTs.Frontiers in immunology · 2026Pooled it
- First-line immunochemotherapy for advanced NSCLC in Asian patients: a meta-analysis of phase 3 RCTs.Frontiers in oncology · 2025Pooled it
- Peripheral blood markers predict prognosis in patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer receiving immunotherapy.Medicine · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
15 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
We collected 96 patients who received dual immunotherapy between January 2019 and June 2024, in a 1:1:1 ratio based on PD-L1 expression levels of negative (<1%), medium (1% ≤ PD-L1 ≤ 49%), and high (PD-L1 ≥ 50%). This study evaluates the efficacy and safety of dual immunotherapy in patients with advanced NSCLC, stratified by PD-L1 expression levels. Among the 96 patients, the objective response rate (ORR) was 37.5%, disease control rate (DCR) was 67.8%. In the multivariate analysis of PFS, PD-L1 ≥ 50% (HR = 0.40, 95% CI: 0.22-0.74) was identified as a protective factor for PFS, while PS Score ≥ 2 (HR = 2.74, 95% CI: 1.11-6.77) and stage IV tumors (HR = 2.05, 95% CI: 1.02-4.12) were risk factors. In the multivariate analysis of OS, PD-L1 between 1% and 49% (HR = 0.51, 95% CI: 0.28-0.90) and PD-L1 ≥ 50% (HR = 0.31, 95% CI: 0.17-0.57) were protective factors, with no risk factors detected. The incidence of adverse events was 77.1%, with a 34.3% incidence of grade 3-4 immune-related adverse events. And PD-L1 ≥ 50% group adverse events incidence more common, with an overall incidence of 87.5% and a grade 3-4 incidence of 40.6%. Patients with high PD-L1 expression (≥50%) demonstrated improved progression-free survival (PFS, HR = 0.40) and overall survival (OS, HR = 0.31) but experienced a higher incidence of severe adverse events (40.6%).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.