ArticleClinical and translational science2025
Retrospective Analysis of Master Protocols in Tumor-Agnostic Drug Development: Evaluation of Application to Single-Agent Therapies With ORR as the Endpoint for Approval of Oncology Drugs.
Article in Clinical and translational science, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Retrospective Analysis of Master Protocols in Tumor-Agnostic Drug Development: Evaluation of Application to Single-Agent Therapies With ORR as the Endpoint for Approval of Oncology Drugs.Clinical and translational science · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The first global approval of a microsatellite instability-high solid tumors was a landmark in oncology, paving the way for targeted therapies approved globally. However, guidance remains limited regarding the biological and methodological conditions under which such designs, statistical borrowing, are most effective. We retrospectively evaluated the feasibility of tumor-agnostic development using Bayesian modeling based on the objective response rate (ORR) as the primary endpoint, focusing on single-agent molecular targeted therapy (MTT) in Japan. Using Pharmaceuticals and Medical Devices Agency (PMDA) approval documents, we identified MTTs approved for ≥ 3 cancer types in Japan between 2001 and 2023. We analyzed whether their ORR in treatment lines without standard therapy exceeded thresholds using the beta-binomial model (BBM) and hierarchical Bayesian model (HBM). Among 97 approved MTTs, 57 were for solid tumors or sarcomas, and 14 for ≥ 3 indications. Poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP) inhibitors and human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 antibody-drug conjugate (HER2 ADC) consistently exceeded thresholds in both models. In contrast, mechanistic target of rapamycin (mTOR) and vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) inhibitors showed generally consistent results across both models, although some exceeded the threshold while others did not, indicating considerable variability. This study evaluates single-agent therapies using ORR as the primary endpoint; therefore, the findings may not apply to combination therapies or endpoints such as progression-free survival or overall survival. Nevertheless, integrating Bayesian models and biological understanding can clarify when statistical borrowing is appropriate, particularly in biologically similar tumor types and improve interpretability and the strategic feasibility of basket trials in tumor-agnostic development.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.