Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40758348›Full record

ArticleJAMA network open2025

Specialization of Home Health Agencies to Deliver Care for Medicare Advantage Patients.

Amanda C Chen, Christina X Fu, David C Grabowski

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JAMA network open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Amanda C ChenDepartment of Health Care Policy, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts.
Christina X FuDepartment of Health Care Policy, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts.
David C GrabowskiDepartment of Health Care Policy, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Importance: Enrollment in Medicare Advantage (MA) is expected to continue growing. Previous studies have examined differences in the use and quality of home health care between MA and traditional Medicare, but less is known about outcomes among patients receiving care from agencies with greater exposure to MA patients. Objective: To examine the association between home health agency (HHA) experience with caring for MA patients and quality of care delivered. Design, Setting, Participants: This cohort study included patients continuously enrolled in MA and who received HHA care in 2019. The data analysis was performed between July 16, 2024, and January 16, 2025. Exposure: Medicare beneficiaries who received home health care from agencies with differing levels of MA specialization. Main Outcomes and Measures: Primary outcomes included hospitalizations during the HHA episode and after HHA discharge (at 30 and 90 days), length of stay, and total number of visits. Secondary outcomes included postdischarge mortality and nursing home admission. The outcomes were measured using instrumental variable analysis. The treatment variable was a continuous measure of the HHA-level share of MA patients. The instrumental variable was the differential distance from the nearest MA-specialized HHA to nearest non-MA-specialized HHA (based on the 75th percentile of the HHA-level share of MA patients from January 1 to December 31, 2019 [ie, ≥36.4%]). Results: The study included 749 719 MA patients who received HHA care in 2019 (mean [SD] age, 76.2 [10.4] years; 61.6% female; 26.3% with dual eligibility), of whom 65.4% received care from an MA-specialized HHA and 34.6% received care from a non-MA-specialized HHA. A 1-mile increase in differential distance was associated with a lower likelihood of admission to more MA-specialized HHAs (0.3 percentage points; SE, 0.015 percentage points; F statistic, 450.73). In the instrumental variable analysis, receiving care from more specialized HHAs was associated with a shorter length of stay (coefficient [SE], -15.14 [2.84] days) and fewer total HHA visits (coefficient [SE], -9.40 [1.15] visits) alongside more hospitalizations and nursing home admissions after discharge from the HHA. Conclusion and Relevance: In this cohort study of MA patients who received HHA care, those receiving care from more MA-specialized HHAs had lower service use during the HHA episode, but no clear differences compared with non-MA-specialized HHAs were observed in care use after discharge. These findings are important given the costs associated with delivering HHA care and the expected growth in MA enrollment.

Indexed as

Home Care AgenciesHome Care ServicesMedicare Part CQuality of Health CareSpecializationAgedAged, 80 and overCohort StudiesFemaleHospitalizationHumansMaleUnited States

Identifiers

PMID40758348
PMCPMC12322794

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.