ArticleThe European journal of neuroscience2025
Bridging Conflicting Views on Eye Position Signals: A Neurocomputational Approach to Perisaccadic Perception: Eye Position Information in Brain and Model.
Article in The European journal of neuroscience, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Perisaccadic Attentional Updating in Area V4: A Neurocomputational Approach.The European journal of neuroscience · 2025Article
- Bridging Conflicting Views on Eye Position Signals: A Neurocomputational Approach to Perisaccadic Perception: Eye Position Information in Brain and Model.The European journal of neuroscience · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Saccades are an integral component of visual perception, yet the accuracy and role of eye position signals in the brain remain unclear. The classical model of perisaccadic perception posits that the dorsal visual system combines an imperfect eye position signal with visual input, leading to systematic perisaccadic mislocalizations under specific experimental conditions. However, neurophysiological studies of eye position information have produced seemingly conflicting results. One team of researchers observed the eye position signal directly in gain-field neurons in the lateral intraparietal area (LIP) and found them incompatible with the classical model. In contrast, another team reported evidence for an eye position signal consistent with the classical model, even showing that accurate eye position can be decoded from neural activity. We modeled two subpopulations of neurons in LIP receiving input from two different sources, one representing the corollary discharge containing predictive presaccadic signals, the other representing a slowly updating proprioceptive eye position signal. By decoding eye position from the neural activity of these subpopulations, we observed the model containing sufficient information to allow the decoder to accurately predict and track the perisaccadic eye position. Our findings reconcile the apparent contradiction between the different neurophysiological studies by providing a unified framework for understanding eye position signals in perisaccadic perception. Our results suggest that a combination of a late-updating proprioceptive signal and a predictive corollary discharge is sufficient for accurately decoding eye position.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.