Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40758184›Full record

ArticleEuropean spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society2025

Learning curve for biportal endoscopic transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion and 90-day postoperative complications during the learning phase: a multicenter retrospective cohort study.

Sang-Min Park, John I Shin, Ju-Eun Kim, Min-Seok Kang, Ki-Han You, Jun S Kim, Samuel K Cho, Hyun-Jin Park

Abstract readMulticenter Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. How many cases to proficiency? A systematic review of the learning curve in endoscopic lumbar interbody fusion.European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society · 2026
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Sang-Min ParkSeoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seoul, Korea, Republic of.
John I ShinCooperman Barnabas Medical Center/Jersey City Medical Center - RWJBarnabas Health, NJ/Jersey City, United States.
Ju-Eun KimBaro Seomyeon Hospital, Busan, Korea, Republic of.
Min-Seok KangKonkuk University Medical Center, Seoul, Korea, Republic of.
Ki-Han YouHallym University College of Medicine, Kangnam Sacred Heart Hospital, Seoul, Korea, Republic of.
Jun S KimIcahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, United States.
Samuel K ChoIcahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, United States.
Hyun-Jin ParkHallym University College of Medicine, Kangnam Sacred Heart Hospital, Seoul, Korea, Republic of. phjfrog@gmail.com.

Funding

Patient-Centered Clinical Research Coordinating Center (PACEN) funded by the Ministry of Health & Welfare grant number: RS-2020- KH096177
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThis study aimed to evaluate the learning curve for biportal endoscopic transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (BE-TLIF) and assess 90-day postoperative complications during the learning phase.

methodsWe retrospectively analyzed 188 consecutive patients who underwent single-level BE-TLIF performed by three surgeons at three institutions. Learning curve-cumulative summation (LC-CUSUM) analysis was used to determine the number of cases required to achieve proficiency, defined as an operative time of less than 160 min. Patients were divided into the early and late groups based on the learning curve. Clinical outcomes, including Oswestry Disability Index and Visual Analog Scale scores for back and leg pain, were assessed preoperatively and at 1 and 3 months postoperatively. Complications within 90 days were recorded and analyzed.

resultsLC-CUSUM analysis showed that surgeons required an average of 39 cases (range: 29-51) to achieve proficiency. Operative time and estimated blood loss significantly decreased in the late group (p < 0.001 and p = 0.002, respectively). Clinical outcomes improved significantly in both groups over time, with no statistically significant differences between the groups. The overall complication rate was 6.9%, with a trend toward lower rates in the late group than in the early group, although this was not statistically significant. The 90-day reoperation rate decreased from 5.1% in the early group to 1.4% in the late group.

conclusionBE-TLIF demonstrated a learning curve comparable to other minimally invasive spine surgeries, with proficiency achieved after approximately 39 cases. Clinical outcomes were favorable and consistent across learning phases, indicating that BE-TLIF can provide significant benefits to patients even during the initial learning period. The trend toward lower complication rates in the late phase than those in the early phase underscores the importance of proper training and experience in maximizing the benefits of this technique.

Indexed as

EndoscopyLearning CurveLumbar VertebraePostoperative ComplicationsSpinal FusionAdultAgedFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedOperative TimeRetrospective StudiesTreatment OutcomeBiportal endoscopyComplicationLearning curveTransforaminal lumbar interbody fusion

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.