ArticleActa neurologica Belgica2025
Influencing factors and clinical value of anti-aquaporin-4 antibody in cerebrospinal fluid: a study of 82 patients with neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder.
Article in Acta neurologica Belgica, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Intrathecal immunoglobulin production in the diagnosis, prognosis, and monitoring of autoimmune diseases of the central nervous system.Journal of translational autoimmunity · 2026Review
- Neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder with painful tonic spasms as the first symptom: a case report.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveSerum AQP4 antibody (AQP4-IgG) is the causative antibody of neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder (NMOSD) but AQP4-IgG in cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) has been seldom studied. We aimed to explore the clinical value and influencing factors of CSF AQP4-IgG in NMOSD.
methodsIn this study, we screened 137 patients with NMOSD diagnosed according to the 2015 International Consensus Diagnostic Criteria (IPND criteria). From this cohort, paired CSF and serum samples were simultaneously collected from 82 patients (including seropositive and seronegative subgroups) for antibody titer measurement. We explored the relationship between CSF AQP4-IgG and patient's clinical features. Their demographic, clinical, laboratory data and MRI images were collected and analyzed.
results74 patients were seropositive for AQP4-IgG and 8 patients were seronegative. Among the 74 patients seropositive for AQP4-IgG, 46 were CSF-positive and 28 were CSF-negative, while none of the 8 seronegative patients were CSF-positive. CSF AQP4-IgG positive and negative patients showed significant differences in EDSS and relapse status. Out of the 82 patients, 67 patients were during relapse and only patients during relapse were included in the next analysis. Between the CSF-positive and CSF-negative patients, no significant differences were found in EDSS, relapse manifestation, CSF indicators, serum cytokine levels, lymphocyte subsets or MRI lesions. Responses to treatment during relapse and length of hospital stay showed no significant differences either. A positive correlation between the serum and CSF titers (rs: 0.64, p < 0.001) was found. Further binary logistic regression analysis revealed that CSF AQP4-IgG positivity was associated with serum AQP4-IgG titers and EDSS scores.
conclusionsCSF AQP4-IgG positivity primarily results from passive diffusion of serum antibodies across the blood-brain barrier, which is different from the CNS-restricted antibody production in MOG-IgG associated disorders (MOGAD). Limited prognostic value of CSF AQP4-IgG was revealed in this study.
Indexed as
Identifiers
40758171What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.