ArticleClinical pharmacology and therapeutics2025
Effectiveness and Safety of Reduced-Dose Prasugrel in an East Asian Population: PRASFIT-ACS Emulation Using National Health Insurance Claims Data.
Article in Clinical pharmacology and therapeutics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Concordance between target trial emulation and randomised controlled trials: systematic review and meta-analysis.BMJ (Clinical research ed.) · 2026Pooled it
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Prasugrel is recommended for acute coronary syndrome (ACS) patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). However, East Asians exhibit a stronger antiplatelet response, raising concerns about bleeding risks with standard dosing. This retrospective cohort study evaluated the real-world effectiveness and safety of reduced-dose prasugrel in an East Asian population by emulating the pivotal PRASFIT-ACS trial using Taiwan's National Health Insurance claims data. In this study, ACS patients were classified into reduced-dose prasugrel or clopidogrel groups post-PCI. We estimated the intention-to-treat effect of initiating reduced-dose prasugrel vs. clopidogrel on the risk of major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) and the per-protocol effect of treating with reduced-dose prasugrel on major bleeding risk using Cox proportional hazard models. A total of 4833 ACS patients were analyzed, including 977 (20.2%) who received reduced-dose prasugrel. Reduced-dose prasugrel showed comparable effectiveness to clopidogrel in preventing MACE (HR: 0.96, 95% CI: 0.72-1.29) and did not increase bleeding risk (HR: 0.82, 95% CI: 0.36-1.90), consistent with PRASFIT-ACS results (HR
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.