ArticleAnnals of African medicine2025
Demystify Carbapenem-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii Pneumonia Burden: 2-Year Cohort Study.
Article in Annals of African medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionThe World Health Organization has identified carbapenem-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii (CRAB) infections as the most important pathogens for which new antibiotics must be developed immediately. Therefore, this study aimed to analyze the comparison of epidemiology, microbial pattern, and antibiotic resistance in CRAB and carbapenem-sensitive A . baumannii (CSAB).
methodsA retrospective cohort study was used, with community-acquired pneumonia with A . baumannii bacterial culture results. Data were obtained from the patient's medical record and the results of antibiotic sensitivity testing with the culture method by planting sputum on blood agar and MacConkey medium for 24 h.
resultsA total of 50 patients, CRAB ( n = 26) and CSAB ( n = 24), found that the average gender was male in CRAB compared to CSAB (69.2% vs. 48.2%). Complications of respiratory failure, sepsis, and acute respiratory distress syndrome were higher in CRAB compared to CSAB (30.8% vs. 20.8%, 46.2% vs. 25%, and 2% vs. 0%). The mortality rate in the CRAB group was 53.8% vs. CSAB 12.5%. The mean length of stay (LOS) in CRAB was 17.92, while CSAB was 11.00. The mean cost of hospitalization in CRAB was higher than CSAB ($6993.0615 vs. $3263.7375). The mean neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio value in the CRAB group was 20.4, while in CSAB was 10.6.
conclusionsThe results indicated that CRAB infection carries a greater burden in terms of cost of treatment, mortality, LOS, and more serious complications, compared to CSAB infection.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.