Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40758108›Full record

ArticleAnnals of African medicine2025

Combination of Tapentadol Nasal Spray and Radiotherapy for Managing Moderate-to-Severe Pain from Lytic Bone Metastasis.

Neeraj Jain, Anshi Jain, Ramita Sharma

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Annals of African medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Neeraj JainDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Sri Guru Ram Das University of Health Sciences, Amritsar, Punjab, India.
Anshi JainDepartment of Medicine KG Somayya Medical College Mumbai, Maharashtra, India.
Ramita SharmaDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Sri Guru Ram Das University of Health Sciences, Amritsar, Punjab, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundTapentadol is known for its opioid-sparing effect, reducing adverse effects associated with opioids, particularly gastrointestinal issues. However, limitations in the oral formulation warrant exploration of alternatives like tapentadol nasal spray for enhanced efficacy and patient experience. AIMS AND

objectivesThis study aimed to assess the safety of tapentadol nasal spray (45mg/dose, administered four times daily) along with radiotherapy in patients with lytic bony metastasis moderate to severe pain. MATERIALS AND

methods65 patients with lytic bony metastasis from solid tumours in 2023 were given local radiotherapy and tapentadol nasal spray (45mg/dose, administered four times daily).

resultsTapentadol nasal spray combined with radiotherapy demonstrated significant pain reduction. Sleep scores were significantly better with tapentadol nasal spray. The nasal route provided enhanced comfort, convenience, safety, and efficacy, offering rapid pain relief.

conclusionTapentadol nasal spray presents a favourable option for bone metastasis pain management along with radiotherapy, offering improved pain reduction, better sleep outcomes, and enhanced patient comfort. The nasal delivery method proves efficient and patient-friendly, marking a significant advancement in achieving early and sustained pain relief.

Indexed as

Bone NeoplasmsCancer PainChemoradiotherapyTapentadolAdministration, IntranasalAdultAgedAnalgesics, OpioidFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedNasal SpraysPain ManagementPain MeasurementSeverity of Illness IndexAnalgesics, OpioidNasal SpraysTapentadolBone metastasisMétastases osseusesradiothérapieradiotherapytapentadol

Identifiers

PMID40758108
PMCPMC12588406

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.