ReviewEFORT open reviews2025
Standardizing definitions of the total knee alignment techniques: recommendations by the Personalized Arthroplasty Society.
Review in EFORT open reviews, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Femoral component sagittal alignment and its influence on short-term outcomes in total knee arthroplasty: a systematic review.BMC musculoskeletal disorders · 2026Pooled it
- Robotic-Assisted unicompartmental knee arthroplasty restores native joint line height and reduces alignment outliers.International orthopaedics · 2025Pooled it
- Bridging postural biomechanics and knee arthroplasty success.Arthroplasty (London, England) · 2026Review
- Effect of preservation versus sacrifice of the posterior cruciate ligament on clinical outcomes after medial congruent total knee arthroplasty using mechanical alignment: A systematic review and meta-analysis.Journal of experimental orthopaedics · 2026Review
- Artificial Intelligence Applications in Implant Positioning, Dislocation Risk Prediction, and Surgical Indications in Orthopaedic Surgery.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Unrestricted kinematic alignment for total knee arthroplasty : a mid- to long-term follow-up non-designer single surgeon study with survival analysis.Bone & joint open · 2026Article
- Reliability of the CPAK classification assessed on long-leg X-rays in patients undergoing total knee arthroplasty.Arthroplasty (London, England) · 2026Article
- Are Currently Available Joint-Specific Patient-Reported Outcome Measures Fit for Purpose to Assess the Outcome of Knee Arthroplasty?Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Article
- Flexion gap discrepancy drives femoral rotational adjustment in robot-assisted TKA: a CPAK-Based phenotypic analysis.BMC musculoskeletal disorders · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Total knee arthroplasty is a highly effective intervention for end-stage osteoarthritis, yet nearly 20% of patients report dissatisfaction with clinical outcomes. This dissatisfaction is often linked to intraoperative parameters, particularly whole-leg alignment and component positioning, which might play a role in ensuring both satisfaction and long-term implant survival. Over the past two decades, alignment techniques have progressed from systematic, two-dimensional methods focused on the frontal plane to more personalized, three-dimensional approaches. This evolution has introduced inconsistencies and confusion among surgeons regarding alignment techniques, terminology, and application, underscoring the need for standardized definitions that can be universally adopted. This work provides standardized definitions for six main knee alignment techniques to enhance communication within the scientific community, particularly in clinical research. While not an exhaustive analysis of each method, this effort focuses on the foundational principles of these techniques, organized using a standardized framework to facilitate comparison and improve clarity in the field.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.