Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40757788›Full record

SynthesisUltrasound in obstetrics & gynecology : the official journal of the International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology2025

Impact of endometrial thickness on reproductive outcome in fresh and frozen-thawed embryo transfer: systematic review and meta-analysis.

F Pérez-Milán, M Caballero-Campo, M Carrera-Roig, J A Domínguez-Arroyo, E Moratalla-Bartolomé, J L Alcázar-Zambrano, L Alonso-Pacheco, J A Carugno, J M Puente-Águeda, S Haimovich and 1 more

Abstract readSystematic ReviewMeta-Analysis
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Ultrasound in obstetrics & gynecology : the official journal of the International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

F Pérez-MilánReproductive Medicine Unit, Obstetrics and Gynecology Department, Hospital General Universitario Gregorio Marañón, Madrid, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-5320-3739
M Caballero-CampoReproductive Medicine Unit, Obstetrics and Gynecology Department, Hospital General Universitario Gregorio Marañón, Madrid, Spain.
M Carrera-RoigUniversidad Complutense, Madrid, Spain.
J A Domínguez-ArroyoInstituto Extremeño de Reproducción Asistida, Badajoz, Spain.
E Moratalla-BartoloméGynecological Surgery and Endoscopy Unit, Hospital Universitario Ramón y Cajal, Madrid, Spain.
J L Alcázar-ZambranoUniversidad de Navarra, Pamplona, Spain.
L Alonso-PachecoGynecological Endoscopy Unit, Obstetrics and Gynecology Department, Hospital Quirón-Salud, Málaga, Spain.
J A CarugnoMiller School of Medicine, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Miami, Miami, FL, USA.
J M Puente-ÁguedaObstetrics and Gynecology Department, Hospital Universitario Doce de Octubre, Madrid, Spain.
S HaimovichGynecology Department, Adelson Medical School, Ariel University, Ariel, Israel.
Spanish Fertility Society Special Interest Group on Benign Organic Reproductive Disorders

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo evaluate the impact of endometrial thickness on the reproductive outcomes of embryo transfer (ET) treatments using both cut-off-based meta-analysis and meta-analysis of proportions.

methodsThis was a systematic review and meta-analysis of comparative studies (randomized controlled trials, cohort studies, case-control studies) and descriptive studies (cross-sectional studies, case series) published in English, French, German, Italian or Spanish and analyzing the impact of endometrial thickness on the rates of embryo implantation, clinical pregnancy, live birth, miscarriage and/or ectopic pregnancy in fresh and/or frozen-thawed ET cycles. Live-birth rate was defined as the primary outcome. The literature search was conducted in MEDLINE, EMBASE, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, ClinicalTrials.gov, Web of Science and ÍnDICEs-CSIC, from inception of each database until 1 September 2024. The risk of bias was assessed using the Newcastle-Ottawa scale for analytical studies and the Joanna Briggs Institute tool for descriptive studies. Pooled effects were estimated as odds ratios (OR) or risk differences obtained from a random-effects model, with 95% CIs. Linear meta-regression was used to assess the relationship between risk difference and endometrial thickness cut-off. Meta-analysis of proportions was performed as a secondary analysis, comparing outcome rates between 2-mm intervals of endometrial thickness and a reference category (≥ 6 to < 8 mm).

resultsA total of 67 studies were included, of which 22 were cohort studies and 45 were descriptive. In fresh ET cycles, the live-birth rate was higher in patients with a thicker endometrium across cut-offs from ≥ 5 mm (OR, 5.66 (95% CI, 1.10-28.98)) to ≥ 15 mm (OR, 1.49 (95% CI, 1.26-1.77)). Effect size decreased linearly as the cut-off increased (P < 0.0001; R

conclusionsEndometrial thickness is associated with reproductive outcomes, but demonstrates a gradient of effectiveness as a prognostic indicator, rather than offering a critical threshold below which ET should be avoided. ET scheduling should consider endometrial thickness alongside other prognostic factors. © 2025 The Author(s). Ultrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology.

Indexed as

Embryo TransferEndometriumAbortion, SpontaneousCryopreservationEmbryo ImplantationFemaleHumansLive BirthPregnancyPregnancy OutcomePregnancy Rateassisted reproductionclinical pregnancyectopic pregnancyembryo implantationembryo transferendometrial thicknessinfertilitylive birthmiscarriage

Identifiers

PMID40757788
PMCPMC12401503

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.