ArticleInternational journal of mental health nursing2025
To Make Another Goal or to Dream a Different Dream-A Mixed Method Study of Experiences of People Using Mental Health Advance Care Planning.
Article in International journal of mental health nursing, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Putting Lived Experience at the Centre: A Critical Review of Multidisciplinary, Person-Centred Mental Health Care.Journal of multidisciplinary healthcare · 2026Review
- To Make Another Goal or to Dream a Different Dream-A Mixed Method Study of Experiences of People Using Mental Health Advance Care Planning.International journal of mental health nursing · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Advance statements are instruments under the Mental Health Act (2014) (Vic) (the Act) in Victoria, Australia that support advance care planning, should a person become a compulsory patient under the Act. Advance care planning supports consumers to have their values and preferences known to the service and other decision makers. Uptake of advance statements in mental health has been poor, and minimal literature is available that explores direct experiences of these instruments by consumers. Feminist Standpoint theory was used in this study as it centres the experience of the marginalised person within the study. This study comprised four in-depth interviews and a survey with 59 responses that explored consumers' direct experiences of using advance statements in Victoria. Results are consistent with past research identifying that many mental health advance statements were consenting documents, although some issues remained with locating the advance statement and identifying the most beneficial staff members to notify. Analysis of the interviews identified four main themes in people's experiences: not being read, working/not working, the use of advocacy and adjusting expectations. Consumers suggested how advance statements could be improved. Specific examples of advocacy by nurses were identified, and as the largest body of mental health workers, nurses have a key role in supporting consumers throughout their journey. Nurses are best placed to enact supported decision making, a key factor in advance care planning. With greater understanding of advance statements, and better resourcing of supported decision-making mechanisms, there is potential for advance statements to contribute to an improved experience for consumers in mental health services.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.