Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40757732›Full record

ArticleBiotechnology and bioengineering2025

Optimized Machine Learning for Autonomous Enzymatic Reaction Intensification in a Self-Driving Lab.

Sebastian Putz, Niklas Teetz, Michael Abt, Pascal Jerono, Thomas Meurer, Matthias Franzreb

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Biotechnology and bioengineering, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Sebastian PutzDepartment for Bioengineering and Biosystems, Karlsruhe Institute of Technology (KIT), Institute of Functional Interfaces (IFG), Eggenstein-Leopoldshafen, Germany.
Niklas TeetzDepartment for Electrobiotechnology, Karlsruhe Institute of Technology (KIT), Institute of Process Engineering in Life Sciences (BLT), Karlsruhe, Germany.
Michael AbtDepartment for Electrobiotechnology, Karlsruhe Institute of Technology (KIT), Institute of Process Engineering in Life Sciences (BLT), Karlsruhe, Germany.
Pascal JeronoDepartment for Digital Process Engineering, Karlsruhe Institute of Technology (KIT), Institute of Mechanical Process Engineering (MVM), Karlsruhe, Germany.
Thomas MeurerDepartment for Digital Process Engineering, Karlsruhe Institute of Technology (KIT), Institute of Mechanical Process Engineering (MVM), Karlsruhe, Germany.
Matthias FranzrebDepartment for Bioengineering and Biosystems, Karlsruhe Institute of Technology (KIT), Institute of Functional Interfaces (IFG), Eggenstein-Leopoldshafen, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3586-4215

Funding

This study was funded from the KIT via the subproject BioCAR in the project Auto.MAP and the Helmholtz Program "Materials Systems Engineering" under Program No. 43.31.01.
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Optimizing enzymatic catalysis is crucial for enhancing the efficiency and scalability of many bioprocesses such as biotransformations, pharmaceutical synthesis, and food processing, as well as for improving the performance of analytical applications, including assays and biosensors. However, optimizing these reactions is challenging due to the multitude of interacting parameters such as pH, temperature, and cosubstrate concentration that require precise adjustment for maximum enzyme activity. Current optimization methods are often labor-intensive and time-consuming, especially when accounting for complex parameter interactions in highly dimensional parameter spaces. To overcome these challenges, we present a machine learning-driven laboratory platform that enables rapid, data-informed optimization of enzymatic reaction conditions in a fully automated environment. By conducting over 10,000 simulated optimization campaigns on a surrogate model generated via linear interpolation of experimentally obtained data, we identified and fine-tuned the most efficient machine learning algorithm for optimizing enzymatic reactions. This allows the platform to autonomously determine optimal reaction conditions with minimal experimental effort and without human intervention. The effectiveness of our approach is demonstrated by the accelerated optimization of reaction conditions in a five-dimensional design space across multiple enzyme-substrate pairings. In conclusion, our self-driving lab platform, equipped with a tailored optimization algorithm, offers a novel and superior alternative to traditional optimization methods. Moreover, the methodology for selecting the most efficient problem-specific optimization algorithm can be extended to self-driving lab platforms with broader applications.

Indexed as

EnzymesMachine LearningAlgorithmsEnzymesautomationautonomousdigitalizationenzymesmachine learningoptimization algorithmself‐driving labs

Identifiers

PMID40757732
PMCPMC12503018

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.