ReviewBiotechnology and bioengineering2025
Host Cell Protein Clinical Safety Risk Assessment-An Updated Industry Review.
Review in Biotechnology and bioengineering, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Impact of downstream purification process and AAV serotype on protein-impurity clearance.Molecular therapy. Advances · 2026Article
- Host cell protein impurities in therapeutic proteins: overview of advances in detection, nonconventional removal technologies and immunogenicity assessment.Journal of biological engineering · 2026Review
- Quantitative Host Cell Protein Analysis of Antibody-Based Protein Therapeutics Using the Orbitrap Astral Mass Spectrometer.Journal of the American Society for Mass Spectrometry · 2026Article
- A quality evaluation strategy for residual host cell proteins based on orthogonal analysis.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
20 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Host cell proteins (HCP) are process-related impurities that can co-purify with therapeutic proteins. Some HCP impurities potentially can have an impact on patient safety (immunogenicity or toxicity), efficacy, and/or product quality. It is important to reduce the levels of HCP impurities with a well-controlled manufacturing process and to monitor levels with a suitable analytical assay. Biopharmaceutical companies are now routinely using mass spectrometry to identify HCPs which are present in process intermediates and potentially in bulk drug substances and using the data to make decisions to continuously improve their processes and mitigate the potential risk to patients. Some companies perform identification of HCPs starting from the nonclinical stage of development, while others perform HCP identification at later stages or as a part of root cause analysis for identified HCP ELISA-related issues, process, and product quality or safety concerns. No matter the approach, a comprehensive risk assessment framework for identified HCPs is needed to support decision-making during development and is expected by regulators to ensure a safe and efficacious drug product. In this paper the BioPhorum Development Group HCP Workstream has brought together a team of industry experts to build upon existing risk assessment frameworks (e.g., de Zafra et al., 2015) and developed recommendations for assessment of clinical safety risks upon identification of individual HCPs, incorporating regulatory considerations and industry experience and using a real-world case study to illustrate the use of the updated frameworks. Key recommendations include conducting clinical risk assessment alongside product quality risk assessment following individual HCP identification and quantitation; focusing on biological activity and immunogenicity for any HCPs of concern; and communicating and collaborating effectively across functions to enable a comprehensive risk assessment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.