ReviewMuscles (Basel, Switzerland)2024
Patellar Tendon Thermographic Reference Values in Healthy People: A Systematic Review.
Review in Muscles (Basel, Switzerland), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionThe physiological response of the tendon structure has been the subject of several studies using clinical thermography, although the lack of normal values limits clinical practice despite being, according to several authors, an optimal diagnostic tool for the study and therapeutic monitoring of soft tissues. To this end, the aim of this systematic review was to explore all the scientific information on thermography and reference values in the patellar tendon.
methodA search was carried out in different health science databases using the MeSH terms "Health", "Patellar Ligament", and "Thermography" with their synonyms in free terms to collect the studies to be included in the systematic review. This review was conducted according with PRISMA guidelines and includes all of the literature up to 19 December 2023. All studies that were in accordance with the PICOS strategy in title and abstract were included in this review, while studies that performed the baseline thermographic test in an altered physiological state were excluded after reading the full text. The TISEM scale was used to assess the quality of the studies; the risk of bias was assessed with the QUADAS-2 scale.
resultA total of 6 articles was selected (n = 148); these were analyzed for quality and found to be highly heterogenous; the risk of bias was low in most domains of the QUADAS-2 scale. DISCUSSION AND
conclusionThere are several variabilities that can induce changes in the thermoregulation process distorting the thermograms. Looking deeper into the evidence behind each item, we can deduce the need to follow the TISEM protocol as closely as possible for an accurate response. The heterogeneity in the way the results were provided and the low quality in some of the studies did not allow for a reference of thermographic values to be obtained.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.