Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40757497›Full record

ArticleEmergency medicine Australasia : EMA2025

Emergency Department Presentations Are Increasing in Acuity in the State of Victoria, Australia-Statewide Hierarchical Regression Model for 2018-2024.

Andy Lim

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Emergency medicine Australasia : EMA, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Andy LimMonash Medical Centre, Clayton, Victoria, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-2522-3927

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundEmergency departments are seeing an ever-increasing number of patients each year due to various gaps in health services. The aim is to measure significant trends in patient numbers and acuity, considering statewide investment in diversion strategies.

methodsA multilevel analysis to test for trend over time in emergency department presentations to public hospital emergency departments from 1st July 2018 to 31st June 2024, taking into account clustering of observations by triage category and by health service, and correcting for population growth. Data were extracted from the Australian Institute of Health and Welfare and Australian Bureau of Statistics.

resultsA total of 11,090,840 emergency presentations were reported by 31 health services. Compound annual growth rate calculation noted a rise in category one (8.6%), two (6.8%) and three (2.9%) presentations, and a corresponding reduction in category four (-3.1%) and five (-5.3%) presentations per year over the five-year period. Total presentations increased by 0.7%, while the state population increased by 1.2% per year over the same period. Multilevel modelling correcting for population growth noted a decrease in category four presentations (-2.4%, 95% CI -3.9, -1.0, p < 0.001) and an increase in category three (4.0%, 95% CI 2.4, 5.6, p < 0.001) and category two (10.2%, 95% CI 4.9, 15.5, p < 0.001) presentations. There was no statistically significant growth in overall numbers (1.4%, 95% CI -3.2, 6, p = 0.552).

conclusionEmergency department presentations appear to be increasing in acuity in the state of Victoria, Australia. This rising urgency should prompt the health system to anticipate and prepare accordingly.

Indexed as

Emergency Service, HospitalPatient AcuityAdultFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedRegression AnalysisTriageVictoriaemergency service hospitalhospitalsmultilevel analysispopulation growthpublictriage

Identifiers

PMID40757497
PMCPMC12320202

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.