ArticleAnnals of medicine2025
Co-design as a participatory approach for enhancing HPV health literacy among youths: a program evaluation.
Article in Annals of medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- A comprehensive analysis of alcohol and other drug educational resources available in New South Wales, Australia for content, suitability and readability.Addiction science & clinical practice · 2025Article
- Co-design approaches in HPV vaccine literacy: opportunities for enhancement.Annals of medicine · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundDespite decades of vaccine availability and the potential consequences of infection, human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccination among youth in the United States remains below herd immunity threshold. In response to suboptimal HPV vaccination rates the Vaccine Literacy Campaign (VLC) implemented a five-week series of HPV vaccination education co-design workshops to engage youth in creating peer vaccine communication. The co-design cohort included thirteen 16 to18-year-olds recruited from a community organization. The goals of the pilot were two-fold: 1) engage participants in co-design activities to co-create resource that promote health literacy, and 2) increase youth confidence and health literacy in relation to HPV vaccination.
methodsEach co-design session was evaluated with a mixed-methods questionnaire to collect participant feedback on implementation and co-design content. Evaluation measured changes in confidence on HPV vaccine knowledge and satisfaction of co-design sessions. Qualitative evaluations focused on best practices for youth engagement strategies and understanding the root of youth vaccine hesitancy and perceived vaccine myths. Each session included co-collaboration amongst participants to develop an educational product promoting uptake of the HPV vaccine.
resultsParticipant knowledge and confidence scales on HPV vaccination increased during the five-week cohort. Participants co-created a website to educate peers about HPV.
conclusionsParticipants responded to and preferred prevention-focused language. Many participants had no prior HPV-related education and were concerned about associated risks of contracting HPV, with minimal participants expressing vaccine hesitancy specifically. Workshop best practices include providing clear explanations of activities, time for information processing, and encouraging participants to ask questions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.