ArticleACS omega2025
Impact of GO Chemical Composition on the Performance of Humidity Sensors.
Article in ACS omega, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Graphene oxide (GO), a structurally defective 2D carbon nanomaterial, is very promising for relative humidity (RH) sensing applications due to the presence of diverse oxygenated functional groups (OFGs) in its structure. The characteristics of GO, such as flake size, degree of oxidation and exfoliation, permanent structural defects, and chemical composition, directly impact the RH detection performance of GO. In this work, we investigated the performance of resistive RH sensors based on three types of GO, prepared using modifications of the Hummers' method, namely, GO-I, GO-II, and GO-III, having different chemical composition, degree of oxidation, as well as different levels of permanent structural defects (carbon vacancies) at the basal plane. GO-based RH sensors were fabricated by drop-casting GO suspensions onto aluminum interdigitated electrodes thermally evaporated onto glass substrates. Among the three characterized RH sensors, GO-II-based devices showed superior performance, with a sensitivity of 2113 ± 2% compared to 1592 ± 1% for GO-I and 388.1 ± 0.1% for GO-III, respectively. All GO sensors demonstrated rapid response and recovery times (ca. 2 and 3 s). Our results indicate that improved quantities of highly polar OFGs, such as carbonyl and hydroxyl groups, and the associated permanent structural defects in GO-II, significantly improved its RH sensing properties. In addition, all GO-based RH sensors can be operated at only 0.1 V, making them suitable for integration into low-power systems.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.